From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tom Lord Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Threads and asyncs Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 20:23:41 -0700 (PDT) Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200209050323.UAA19606@morrowfield.regexps.com> References: <87it1oglmq.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <02090418461625.19624@locke.free-expression.org> <200209050020.RAA18890@morrowfield.regexps.com> <02090420452627.19624@locke.free-expression.org> <200209050238.TAA19359@morrowfield.regexps.com> <87ptvtjhhl.fsf@becket.becket.net> <200209050243.TAA19428@morrowfield.regexps.com> <87lm6hjh0t.fsf@becket.becket.net> <200209050300.UAA19495@morrowfield.regexps.com> <878z2hjg8i.fsf@becket.becket.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1031195431 23526 127.0.0.1 (5 Sep 2002 03:10:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 03:10:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tb@becket.net Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17mn2L-00067J-00 for ; Thu, 05 Sep 2002 05:10:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17mn3w-00010A-00; Wed, 04 Sep 2002 23:12:08 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17mn3A-0000Pm-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2002 23:11:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17mn38-0000Kn-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2002 23:11:19 -0400 Original-Received: from 1cust223.tnt13.sfo8.da.uu.net ([63.10.241.223] helo=morrowfield.regexps.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17mn36-0000Kj-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2002 23:11:17 -0400 Original-Received: (from lord@localhost) by morrowfield.regexps.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id UAA19606; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 20:23:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lord@morrowfield.regexps.com) Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <878z2hjg8i.fsf@becket.becket.net> (tb@becket.net) Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1296 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1296 > You use the same strategy. You have decided that (eq? #t '()) is the > Right Thing Only because I have written a lot of code, from both perspetives. I am not debating, when I post here. More like: "reporting". > You seem to think everything is personal, I do not. > which pisses me > off no end. I'm sorry. > I have no idea what you were talking about in Scheme regards > in Tech Sq. Revok(? was that how it was spelled? it's somewhere on google) stems from the same roots, for example. I wonder if I still have, on some backup tape or other, the Scheme impl. sketches that the near-to-FSF-community shared, back then. I suppose I am blessed with a very detailed memory of some events. > I admit the graphic design of your web pages is fun. Thank you again. I credit mostly Scott Draves' computationational art, which I mostly tried to set against a complementary color scheme and not distract from with too much text. Plus, I outright stole a three-word poetic form that he initiated at CMU..... Uh.... why is this on guile-devel? Sorry folks -- having put tb's and my interactions in a hopefully more favorable light, I'll take the non-technical foo off-list now. -t _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel