From: NIIBE Yutaka <gniibe@m17n.org>
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org, guile-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Threads and asyncs
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 07:30:43 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200209042230.g84MUhl18966@mule.m17n.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r8g97hw9.fsf@zagadka.ping.de>
Marius Vollmer wrote:
> Asyncronous signals are also a clean way to break up a dead-lock.
Well, yup, it's convenient to break up dead-lock by some interruption
scheme. That's true. However, I think that it's not UNIX signal and
its signal handler, in general. Definitely not.
I think that we're talking about Guile language support for UNIX
siganls and threads. In this case, we need to think about the
semantics of UNIX signals with thread library. Please refer some
thread programming introduction(s) for UNIX signal.
http://www.serpentine.com/~bos/threads-faq/
Bil Lewis and Daniel J. Berg, Multithreaded Programming with Pthread
Or else, looking the implementation such as Python would help.
--
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-04 22:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-02 20:52 Threads and asyncs Marius Vollmer
2002-09-02 21:24 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-02 21:53 ` Marius Vollmer
[not found] ` <87bs7ggiss.fsf@zagadka.ping.de>
2002-09-02 22:24 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-02 23:51 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-09-02 23:02 ` Rob Browning
2002-09-02 23:24 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-02 23:36 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-02 23:52 ` Lynn Winebarger
2002-09-03 0:57 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-03 1:13 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-09-03 1:29 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-03 1:31 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-03 1:00 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-09-03 1:28 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-03 1:23 ` RnRS process/history/documentation (was Re: Threads and asyncs) Lynn Winebarger
2002-09-03 1:27 ` Threads and asyncs Rob Browning
2002-09-03 1:45 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-03 1:48 ` Lynn Winebarger
2002-09-04 23:46 ` Lynn Winebarger
2002-09-05 0:20 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-05 1:45 ` Lynn Winebarger
2002-09-05 2:38 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-05 2:30 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-09-05 2:43 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-05 2:40 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-09-05 3:00 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-05 2:57 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-09-05 3:23 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-05 3:14 ` Lynn Winebarger
2002-09-05 4:00 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-05 3:51 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-09-05 4:01 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-05 22:03 ` Lynn Winebarger
2002-09-03 1:34 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-09-03 18:06 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-09-04 0:28 ` NIIBE Yutaka
2002-09-04 18:02 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-09-04 22:30 ` NIIBE Yutaka [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200209042230.g84MUhl18966@mule.m17n.org \
--to=gniibe@m17n.org \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=guile-user@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).