From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sven Hartrumpf Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Guile 1.5.8 beta available for testing. Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 13:14:15 +0200 (CEST) Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <20020903.131415.41648079.Sven.Hartrumpf@FernUni-Hagen.de> References: <87ptw312u3.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <20020828.163839.74750750.Sven.Hartrumpf@FernUni-Hagen.de> <15725.5137.331738.600323@blauw.xs4all.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1031051615 18190 127.0.0.1 (3 Sep 2002 11:13:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 11:13:35 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17mBcj-0004jH-00 for ; Tue, 03 Sep 2002 13:13:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17mBeH-0007E2-00; Tue, 03 Sep 2002 07:15:09 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17mBde-0006s8-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2002 07:14:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17mBdc-0006rs-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2002 07:14:30 -0400 Original-Received: from oak.fernuni-hagen.de ([132.176.114.41]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17mBdb-0006qo-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2002 07:14:27 -0400 Original-Received: from amavis by oak.FernUni-Hagen.de with scanned-ok (Exim 4.04) id 17mBda-0000Hy-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2002 13:14:26 +0200 Original-Received: from ki220.fernuni-hagen.de ([132.176.72.220] helo=localhost) by oak.FernUni-Hagen.de with esmtp (Exim 4.04) id 17mBdU-0000Gj-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2002 13:14:20 +0200 Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <15725.5137.331738.600323@blauw.xs4all.nl> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.0.58 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1256 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1256 On 28 Aug 2002, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > > > I.e., what processes show this behaviour. > > > > A medium-sized program doing lots of symbol, string, and list construction. > > Really GC-intensive programs (around 30% of runtime with bigloo). > > The synthetic benchmark I use for GC testing spends at 25% an > artificially high amount of time in GC -- > Yours is Real Life Yes. > and takes 30% GC time? Yes, depending on the implementation between 20 and 40%. Sven _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel