From: rm@fabula.de
Cc: rm@fabula.de, tomas@fabula.de, guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Smart variables, dumb variables
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 14:01:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020820120114.GA22160@www> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877kimxwab.fsf@zagadka.ping.de>
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 01:29:16AM +0200, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> Marius Vollmer <mvo@zagadka.ping.de> writes:
>
> > rm@fabula.de writes:
> >
> > > > Should it print #<primitive-generic +> from the start?
> > >
> > > Since it actually _is_ a generic from the start, yes, i think it should.
> >
> > Ok, agreed. Objections?
>
> Done.
Allmost, if i might say so ;-)
*---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| ralf@calvin:~$ guile
| guile> (use-modules (oop goops))
| guile> (class-of +)
| #<<procedure-class> <procedure> 808f6f0>
| guile> (define-method (+ (a <string>) (b <string>)) (string-append a b))
| guile> (class-of +)guile> (class-of +)
| #<<procedure-class> <primitive-generic> 808f690>
| guile> ralf@calvin:~$ exit
|
I don't know how easy this is to fix but this is the kind of code
one might want to use to test whether '(define-generic foo)' has to
be called. If the class of 'foo' only changes to 'primitve-generic'
after a call to 'define-method' that doesn't really help, or?
Ralf
But thank's anyway.
>
> --
> GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Guile-devel mailing list
> Guile-devel@gnu.org
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-20 12:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-13 20:06 Smart variables, dumb variables Marius Vollmer
2002-08-14 8:07 ` tomas
2002-08-14 19:35 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-14 20:28 ` tomas
2002-08-14 20:48 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-14 21:06 ` rm
2002-08-14 21:09 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-15 8:06 ` rm
2002-08-15 8:01 ` Lynn Winebarger
2002-08-15 9:51 ` rm
2002-08-15 14:44 ` Rob Browning
2002-08-15 16:34 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-15 17:27 ` rm
2002-08-15 19:43 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-15 20:02 ` rm
2002-08-15 20:02 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-15 20:25 ` rm
2002-08-17 11:59 ` Neil Jerram
2002-08-19 23:29 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-20 12:01 ` rm [this message]
2002-08-26 22:06 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-15 10:52 ` tomas
2002-08-15 16:36 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-14 21:31 ` Rob Browning
2002-08-14 21:45 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-15 2:43 ` Rob Browning
2002-08-15 6:29 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-15 14:38 ` Rob Browning
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020820120114.GA22160@www \
--to=rm@fabula.de \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=tomas@fabula.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).