From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Dale P. Smith" Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?) Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 18:37:30 -0400 Organization: Altus Technologies Corporation Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <20020817183730.7e523163.dsmith@altustech.com> References: <20020808134824.GB23831@www> <20020808102103.021cdc0c.dsmith@altustech.com> <874re5mnfs.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <20020808161958.GA24162@www> <20020809100046.GB25104@www> <87u1m26aff.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87it2fmw03.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1029624614 7326 127.0.0.1 (17 Aug 2002 22:50:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 22:50:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rm@fabula.de, mkoeppe@saturn.Math.Uni-Magdeburg.De, rlb@defaultvalue.org, guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17gCOV-0001ti-00 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2002 00:50:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17gCPW-0005Oi-00; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 18:51:10 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17gCPJ-0005Nh-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 18:50:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17gCPE-0005N0-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 18:50:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [208.40.56.34] (helo=borg.altus.cc) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17gCPE-0005MU-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 18:50:52 -0400 Original-Received: from sparky (oh-strongsvillecadent1-1c-245.clvhoh.adelphia.net [68.69.211.245]) by borg-eth1.altus.cc (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id g7HMbVJ06481; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 18:37:31 -0400 Original-To: Marius Vollmer In-Reply-To: <87it2fmw03.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.1claws3 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu) Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1110 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1110 On 13 Aug 2002 02:40:28 +0200 Marius Vollmer wrote: > Marius Vollmer writes: > > > rm@fabula.de writes: > > > > > Should this be documented soon? > > > > Will do. > > Done. Please have a look. (In CVS HEAD.) Looks good, but there should be @var{} around the actual names of the arguments, for example: @deftypefn {C Procedure} SCM scm_c_define_module (const char *name, void (*init) (void *), void *data) Should be: @deftypefn {C Procedure} SCM scm_c_define_module (const char *@var{name}, void (*@var{init}) (void *), void *@var{data}) I've found that you can force texinfo to do line breaks between arguments for long winded functions if you surround them with {}. @deftypefn {C Procedure} SCM scm_c_define_module ({const char *@var{name},} {void (*@var{init}) (void *),} {void *@var{data}}) -Dale -- Dale P. Smith Senior Systems Consultant, | Treasurer, Altus Technologies Corporation | Cleveland Linux Users Group dsmith@altustech.com | http://cleveland.lug.net 440-746-9000 x339 | _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel