From: rm@fabula.de
Cc: rm@fabula.de, Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>,
"Dale P. Smith" <dsmith@altustech.com>,
guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?)
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 15:23:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020809132333.GB25401@www> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <uw5lm7g6zju.fsf@saturn.math.uni-magdeburg.de>
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 01:29:09PM +0200, Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>
> It is an opaque argument...
>
> > - what is passed to the init function in the void pointer and
> > what is the function supposed to return?
>
> ... that is simply passed to the init function when it is invoked.
So this is "userdata", i see.
> (This makes the init function a "C closure".) The init function
> returns nothing (it has "void" return type).
<blush>Grumpf! I _hate_ C's function pointer syntax ... </blush>
> >> I believe it's only an accident that the functions are not documented
> >> (except for the NEWS blurb). I think documentation should be added;
> >> the changes should also go into the 1.6 release. Preliminary
> >> documentation can be found in the above message by Marius.
> >
> > Should this be documented soon?
>
> Ralf, maybe you want to prepare a patch that adds the documentation to
> Guile.
This was partly implied by my question. But i first need to finish up
the docs on "guardians from C" i promised earlier this week (got dis-
tracted by all that module stuff which i need to get working asap).
Ralf
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-09 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-08 13:48 What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?) rm
2002-08-08 14:21 ` Dale P. Smith
2002-08-08 14:23 ` Dale P. Smith
2002-08-08 14:31 ` Rob Browning
2002-08-08 16:19 ` rm
2002-08-08 17:59 ` Dale P. Smith
2002-08-08 18:24 ` rm
2002-08-08 20:26 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-08 21:28 ` Neil Jerram
2002-08-09 15:36 ` rm
2002-08-17 11:59 ` Neil Jerram
2002-08-19 19:05 ` rm
2002-08-09 8:47 ` Matthias Koeppe
2002-08-09 10:00 ` rm
2002-08-09 11:29 ` Matthias Koeppe
2002-08-09 13:23 ` rm [this message]
2002-08-10 14:44 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-11 23:20 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-17 8:09 ` Dirk Herrmann
2002-08-17 11:05 ` Neil Jerram
2002-08-24 8:08 ` Dirk Herrmann
2002-08-26 21:45 ` Neil Jerram
2002-08-26 22:04 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-21 19:35 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-13 0:40 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-17 22:37 ` Dale P. Smith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020809132333.GB25401@www \
--to=rm@fabula.de \
--cc=dsmith@altustech.com \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=rlb@defaultvalue.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).