From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tom Lord Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: status: separation of expansion/optimization/memoization/execution Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2002 19:05:19 -0700 (PDT) Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200208040205.TAA14205@morrowfield.regexps.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1028426488 25552 127.0.0.1 (4 Aug 2002 02:01:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2002 02:01:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: hanwen@cs.uu.nl, guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17bAhy-0006dv-00 for ; Sun, 04 Aug 2002 04:01:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17bAiZ-00037D-00; Sat, 03 Aug 2002 22:02:03 -0400 Original-Received: from 1cust59.tnt13.sfo8.da.uu.net ([63.10.241.59] helo=morrowfield.regexps.com) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17bAiD-00033Q-00 for ; Sat, 03 Aug 2002 22:01:41 -0400 Original-Received: (from lord@localhost) by morrowfield.regexps.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id TAA14205; Sat, 3 Aug 2002 19:05:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lord@morrowfield.regexps.com) Original-To: dirk@sallust.ida.ing.tu-bs.de Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:947 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:947 > IMO the code cleanup is the important point here. Such work was rudely interrupted in the early days and, I agree, is very important, hence, long overdue. My bibop comment went by un-acked --- really and truly, just from a schemeimplhacking perspective, look into that direction. I used to think -- "no gc strategy is special -- bibop advocates are exaggerating", but after plotting out a fresh implementation in detail -- nah, they are exactly right. Staggered tags and bipbop. -t "Rape me" -- Kurt Kobain _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel