From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christopher Cramer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] nonblocking write/recv/send/connect/accept Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 20:07:33 -0500 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <20020628200733.A3168@kiwi.pyrotechnics.com> References: <20020327130351.B27416@kiwi.pyrotechnics.com> <87bsav0z4q.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1025312945 24266 127.0.0.1 (29 Jun 2002 01:09:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 01:09:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Christopher Cramer , guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17O6jZ-0006JH-00 for ; Sat, 29 Jun 2002 03:09:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17O6jd-0005RQ-00; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 21:09:09 -0400 Original-Received: from pyro.net ([207.7.10.6] helo=kiwi.pyro.net) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17O6hw-0005Gp-00 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 21:07:24 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 3571 invoked by uid 8610); 29 Jun 2002 01:07:33 -0000 Original-To: Marius Vollmer Mail-Followup-To: Marius Vollmer , Christopher Cramer , guile-devel@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <87bsav0z4q.fsf@zagadka.ping.de>; from mvo@zagadka.ping.de on Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 05:58:29PM +0200 Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:714 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:714 On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 05:58:29PM +0200, Marius Vollmer wrote: > Could you try to collect this pattern into its own set of functions > (ala fport_wait_for_input)? I think this will make the code much > cleaner. One thing is, we need functions in both socket.c and fports.c, and fport_wait_for_input is static. Should I put the functions in both files, or make them extern? -- Christopher Cramer On résiste à l'invasion des armées; on ne résiste pas à l'invasion des idées. -- Victor Hugo _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel