From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: rm@fabula.de Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Release status 1.6.1 (2002-05-16) Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 12:22:22 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <20020528102222.GB29680@www> References: <878z6jn0uw.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87r8k41h0j.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87r8k41ctd.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <20020526165939.GA27611@www> <87ptzhuxqz.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <20020527213832.GC28747@www> <873cwczy6g.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1022581441 13704 127.0.0.1 (28 May 2002 10:24:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 10:24:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rm@fabula.de, Marius Vollmer , Neil Jerram , guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17Ce92-0003Yv-00 for ; Tue, 28 May 2002 12:24:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17Ce3I-0002uT-00; Tue, 28 May 2002 06:18:04 -0400 Original-Received: from www.elogos.de ([212.18.192.92]) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17Ce1u-0002oD-00 for ; Tue, 28 May 2002 06:16:39 -0400 Original-Received: by www.elogos.de (Postfix, from userid 5001) id 610861049B9; Tue, 28 May 2002 12:22:22 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Rob Browning Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <873cwczy6g.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:658 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:658 On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 11:36:07PM -0500, Rob Browning wrote: > [...] Thanks for the clarification. > So the question is, what *is* the right thing to do? The FSF > "standards" info pages have a little relevant info, but nothing > definitive: > > The `README' file should also refer to the file which contains the > copying conditions. The GNU GPL, if used, should be in a file > called `COPYING'. If the GNU LGPL is used, it should be in a file > called `COPYING.LIB'. Ah, licences with namespaces ;-) So why not COPYING.GUILE and GPL? I have to admit that i didn't see the amount of work required to rename the files (never rename base classes). > So I've filed a bug against the GNU standards package. Let's see what > they say... Delegate ... Thanks, Ralf > Rob Browning > rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org > Previously @cs.utexas.edu > GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C 64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD > > _______________________________________________ > Guile-devel mailing list > Guile-devel@gnu.org > http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel