From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Han-Wen Nienhuys Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: doco srfi-1 iota Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 01:16:52 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <16137.65380.115639.994664@localhost.localdomain> References: <871xx2ov97.fsf@zip.com.au> Reply-To: hanwen@cs.uu.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1057619980 953 80.91.224.249 (7 Jul 2003 23:19:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 23:19:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 08 01:19:38 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19ZfGk-0000FE-00 for ; Tue, 08 Jul 2003 01:19:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19ZfFq-0008Oz-5W for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Jul 2003 19:18:42 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19ZfFD-0007wR-92 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jul 2003 19:18:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19ZfEv-0006tB-Tx for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jul 2003 19:17:46 -0400 Original-Received: from smtpzilla5.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.141]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19ZfE9-00062B-7G for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jul 2003 19:16:57 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost.localdomain.xs4all.nl (byrd.xs4all.nl [213.84.26.127]) by smtpzilla5.xs4all.nl (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h67NGoVx079432; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 01:16:50 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Kevin Ryde In-Reply-To: <871xx2ov97.fsf@zip.com.au> X-Mailer: VM 7.14 under Emacs 21.2.1 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2601 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2601 user42@zip.com.au writes: > * srfi-modules.texi (SRFI-1 Constructors): In iota, reword a bit for > clarity and add a couple of examples. > > I found the formula for each element less clear than it could be, and > thought a couple of examples would be enough to illustrate what > happens. In general, I wonder why the SRFI documentation doesn't have much examples. In some cases, the text of the SRFI itself is more clear. which begs the question, why aren't the SRFIs themselves used as documentation? -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | hanwen@cs.uu.nl | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel