From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Han-Wen Nienhuys Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: some rpm building questions Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 13:56:12 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <15773.33244.537423.220977@meddo.cs.uu.nl> References: <1033682765.2197.59.camel@li.mine.nu> <1033698046.2059.140.camel@li.mine.nu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1033732900 11748 127.0.0.1 (4 Oct 2002 12:01:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 12:01:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17xR9H-00033M-00 for ; Fri, 04 Oct 2002 14:01:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17xR8p-0002Ec-00; Fri, 04 Oct 2002 08:01:11 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17xR49-0003qx-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2002 07:56:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17xR41-0003la-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2002 07:56:15 -0400 Original-Received: from aurora.cs.uu.nl ([131.211.80.20] helo=mail.cs.uu.nl) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17xR41-0003kJ-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2002 07:56:13 -0400 Original-Received: from meddo.cs.uu.nl.cs.uu.nl (meddo.cs.uu.nl [131.211.80.91]) by mail.cs.uu.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A65721CB263; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 13:56:12 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Bo Forslund In-Reply-To: <1033698046.2059.140.camel@li.mine.nu> X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under Emacs 21.2.1 Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1429 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1429 bo.forslund@abc.se writes: > The spec ended up packing like this. Is it OK? And how about ltdl? Can > the old one be replaced? Can libtool use this libltdl if the old one is > replaced? > > Bo > > > guile > /usr/bin/guile For which distribution is this spec? It would be nice if packages were named to something like guile1.6 so that you can install multiple (binary incompatible) releases next to each other. This would be especially cool for RedHat, since GUILE 1.6 managed to slip past the RedHat 8 release date (making guile 1.4 the RH standard for the coming years.) > The spec ended up packing like this. Is it OK? And how about ltdl? Can > the old one be replaced? Can libtool use this libltdl if the old one is > replaced? I wouldn't opt for that many subpackages. The space savings would be small, and it confuses users. I'd rather have a single guile and guile-devel package; -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | hanwen@cs.uu.nl | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen/ _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel