From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Han-Wen Nienhuys Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: port initialization? Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 00:06:00 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <15709.30536.605765.742717@blauw.xs4all.nl> References: <15693.15724.416839.636665@blauw.xs4all.nl> <15698.51215.103077.669940@blauw.xs4all.nl> <87lm7h2iu1.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <15698.55934.287636.6739@blauw.xs4all.nl> <87sn1pt5md.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <15698.64494.554986.819322@blauw.xs4all.nl> <87bs8a7seo.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> Reply-To: hanwen@cs.uu.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1029535335 14183 127.0.0.1 (16 Aug 2002 22:02:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 22:02:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17fpAc-0003gd-00 for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 00:02:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17fpBZ-0006AJ-00; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 18:03:13 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17fpB5-00067k-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 18:02:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17fpB3-00067Y-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 18:02:43 -0400 Original-Received: from smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.137]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17fpB3-00067O-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 18:02:41 -0400 Original-Received: from blauw.xs4all.nl (blauw.xs4all.nl [213.84.26.127]) by smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g7GM2cXS053348; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 00:02:39 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Marius Vollmer In-Reply-To: <87bs8a7seo.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> X-Mailer: VM 7.05 under Emacs 21.2.1 Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1103 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1103 mvo@zagadka.ping.de writes: > > I took a look at the scm_memory_error() calls. From what I gather, > > most of them are not really valid, in the sense that they often follow > > malloc() calls (as opposed to scm_malloc) -- it might be that GC-ing > > frees enough memory to satisfy the request. > > I see. So we should probably replace the calls to malloc with calls > to scm_malloc. Anyone? :-) in CVS. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | hanwen@cs.uu.nl | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel