From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Han-Wen Nienhuys Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: port initialization? Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 21:37:05 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <15698.51297.309966.488279@blauw.xs4all.nl> References: <15693.15724.416839.636665@blauw.xs4all.nl> Reply-To: hanwen@cs.uu.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1028835199 32335 127.0.0.1 (8 Aug 2002 19:33:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 19:33:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17ct26-0008PO-00 for ; Thu, 08 Aug 2002 21:33:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17ct2q-00005M-00; Thu, 08 Aug 2002 15:34:04 -0400 Original-Received: from smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.139]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17ct2c-0008W2-00 for ; Thu, 08 Aug 2002 15:33:51 -0400 Original-Received: from blauw.xs4all.nl (blauw.xs4all.nl [213.84.26.127]) by smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g78JXnKE027936; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 21:33:49 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Marius Vollmer In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 7.05 under Emacs 21.2.1 Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1021 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1021 marius.vollmer@uni-dortmund.de writes: > > Why not > > [...] > > { > > scm_t_port *newport = scm_add_to_port_table (); > > SCM port = scm_cell (scm_tc16_port, newport); > > newport->port = port; > > .. > > } > > This will leak newport when the call to scm_cell throws. We could have a scm_add_to_port_table() that returns an SCM, that would be less error prone -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | hanwen@cs.uu.nl | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel