From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Han-Wen Nienhuys Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: read errors Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 01:15:56 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <15695.1836.222887.354220@blauw.xs4all.nl> References: <15693.46860.769864.876889@blauw.xs4all.nl> Reply-To: hanwen@cs.uu.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1028589160 13725 127.0.0.1 (5 Aug 2002 23:12:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 23:12:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17br1h-0003ZE-00 for ; Tue, 06 Aug 2002 01:12:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17br2G-0003JR-00; Mon, 05 Aug 2002 19:13:12 -0400 Original-Received: from smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.139]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17br1v-0003Fw-00 for ; Mon, 05 Aug 2002 19:12:51 -0400 Original-Received: from blauw.xs4all.nl (blauw.xs4all.nl [213.84.26.127]) by smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g75NChJE072388; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 01:12:44 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Marius Vollmer In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 7.05 under Emacs 21.2.1 Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1004 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1004 marius.vollmer@uni-dortmund.de writes: > > Maybe this is a kludge? > > No, I think it's the best we can do with the present system. ok. > > snprintf (s, 1024, "%s\nThis happened in %s%s%s line %d column %d", message, > > Can we use scm_simple_format here? That would avoid the 1024 limit > and would also feel more gentle since we don't need to poke into the > strings private parts. Yep, done, committed. (Scheme beginner, didn't know about simple-format.) -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | hanwen@cs.uu.nl | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel