unofficial mirror of guile-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@cs.uu.nl>
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: SCM_PTR_LE ?
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 19:16:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <15689.27909.668671.145902@meddo.cs.uu.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <lj4ree5y7l.fsf@burns.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de>

marius.vollmer@uni-dortmund.de writes:
> > I think that pointer comparison is pretty well defined in ANSI C; can
> > you think of a solid reason to support them?
> 
> What is that definition?  I think ANSI C only defines the outcome of
> comparisons for pointers that point into the same object, i.e., the

I stand corrected, I looked it up in the N843 document
(http://www.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/n843.htm), and you're
right.

> same array or a single block returned from malloc.  A consequence
> would be that you can not reliably test whether a pointer does point
> into some object, since the results are not defined when it points
> outside.  For example, is the following guaranteed to print "sane"?

However, that point is completely moot, since the binary search code
in heap_segment () (new GC: scm_find_heap_segment_containing_object)
is full of code that compares pointers outside their blocks.  Unless
that is scrapped (not), SCM_PTR_* can go.



-- 
Han-Wen Nienhuys   |   hanwen@cs.uu.nl    | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen/


_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel


  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-08-01 17:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-27 18:50 SCM_PTR_LE ? Han-Wen
2002-07-30 17:00 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-07-30 22:24   ` Han-Wen
2002-08-01 16:40     ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-01 17:09       ` Mr. Peter Ivanyi
2002-08-01 17:15       ` Lynn Winebarger
2002-08-01 20:08         ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-01 17:16       ` Han-Wen Nienhuys [this message]
2002-08-01 17:24         ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2002-08-01 20:09         ` Marius Vollmer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=15689.27909.668671.145902@meddo.cs.uu.nl \
    --to=hanwen@cs.uu.nl \
    --cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).