From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Han-Wen Nienhuys Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: GC rewrite, first version. Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 11:59:41 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <15689.1677.233727.193937@meddo.cs.uu.nl> References: <15685.48166.358219.226421@blauw.xs4all.nl> <15688.9798.978583.867042@meddo.cs.uu.nl> <87eldja9b4.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1028195972 2860 127.0.0.1 (1 Aug 2002 09:59:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 09:59:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Dirk Herrmann , guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17aCjz-0000k1-00 for ; Thu, 01 Aug 2002 11:59:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17aCkW-0007sj-00; Thu, 01 Aug 2002 06:00:04 -0400 Original-Received: from aurora.cs.uu.nl ([131.211.80.20] helo=mail.cs.uu.nl) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17aCkA-0007qg-00 for ; Thu, 01 Aug 2002 05:59:42 -0400 Original-Received: from meddo.cs.uu.nl.cs.uu.nl (meddo.cs.uu.nl [131.211.80.91]) by mail.cs.uu.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A9561CB250; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 11:59:41 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Rob Browning In-Reply-To: <87eldja9b4.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under Emacs 21.2.1 Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:913 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:913 rlb@defaultvalue.org writes: > I consider the latter uglier, and wouldn't choose it myself, but I > could manage with either if the convention were consistently used. > > > And for the rest, I think that GUILE 1.6 should be released. > > Agreed. I've fixed the remaining issues, and 1.5.7 has been ready for > upload since last week, but I've been waiting for alpha.gnu.org to > become available again. You could simply make it available through another channel? -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | hanwen@cs.uu.nl | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen/ _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel