From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nala Ginrut Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: include can't work Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:06:53 +0800 Organization: HFG Message-ID: <1384830413.11916.67.camel@Renee-desktop.suse> References: <1384501247.11916.8.camel@Renee-desktop.suse> <87txfb90m2.fsf@netris.org> <8738mv8hlg.fsf@netris.org> <1384761343.11916.63.camel@Renee-desktop.suse> <87txf960k2.fsf@netris.org> <87pppx60fz.fsf@netris.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1384830428 5071 80.91.229.3 (19 Nov 2013 03:07:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 03:07:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel To: Mark H Weaver Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 19 04:07:12 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vibei-00035A-LL for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 04:07:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46823 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vibeh-0008Om-VR for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 22:07:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50244) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VibeZ-0008Of-KH for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 22:07:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VibeT-0003bl-Pn for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 22:07:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pd0-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::230]:50599) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VibeT-0003bL-Hi for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 22:06:57 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pd0-f176.google.com with SMTP id w10so5297209pde.21 for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 19:06:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9xelP89CLkjsKX04Zye6ZWvYjP1NkODFIWC0WGZVt5c=; b=gVBhDRI/42jYqJTsD6d/Jdv7iweZjbfkZfGIBBM7hjJEyIVt1FEG3XBKJdiIKdzHY4 hoNF9qI+BVycyz6E0FDn3g8WFfzp+GmE/75m8hXF67a32Y3hjT21a4c/+zXVPgYzsEwv wCjFsRPuKdfZoUm0IRKzB7lNqOXsodbGLrCn/ZlnzyQdiy8RIPyDLFbnrVwBF8Gc19v0 optSsx4eRE//tXFZKKtKE1OoPFH2ijYvWUPr6zYCaaQKfNBy5TMO8fdKoCqimSPvTtpg dFyv8B/lC9UvyiR3R9VPwri7SYM018D9NYp6j0dVmG1J3bM7mdYZnkAiLYibmyHjZKlE LGSQ== X-Received: by 10.66.170.138 with SMTP id am10mr23833166pac.51.1384830416379; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 19:06:56 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [147.2.147.115] ([203.192.156.9]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id uf2sm26772602pbc.28.2013.11.18.19.06.54 for (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 18 Nov 2013 19:06:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87pppx60fz.fsf@netris.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c02::230 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:16756 Archived-At: On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 13:15 -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote: > Mark H Weaver writes: > > This should work if "a.scm" and "b.scm" are files in the same directory. > > It works for me. I'm unable to reproduce the problem you're seeing. > > Can you help me to reproduce it? How are you loading "a.scm"? > > It occurs to me that this might be caused by one of your Guile > customizations. Can you try it with your customizations disabled? > I tried it under 'guile -q' ,and the problem remains, but it's OK for absolute path. Did I miss something? > Thanks, > Mark