From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nala Ginrut Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Is guile-dbi still mainaining? Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 23:55:35 +0800 Organization: HFG Message-ID: <1360252535.17721.19.camel@Renee-desktop.suse> References: <1360224714.12087.8.camel@Renee-desktop.suse> <1360242982.49533.YahooMailNeo@web120405.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <1360244582.17721.8.camel@Renee-desktop.suse> <87d2wcb18h.fsf@zigzag.favinet> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1360254739 31032 80.91.229.3 (7 Feb 2013 16:32:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 16:32:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel To: Thien-Thi Nguyen Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 07 17:32:40 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U3UOp-00072Q-PQ for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:32:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57845 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3UOW-0002CO-UO for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 11:32:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42679) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3TpH-0002UN-7r for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 10:55:52 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3TpC-0004z4-5A for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 10:55:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-da0-f51.google.com ([209.85.210.51]:47213) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3TpB-0004yu-P8 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 10:55:46 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-da0-f51.google.com with SMTP id n15so1286087dad.10 for ; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 07:55:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:content-type:x-mailer:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=IgErzNTiG1Aked5XoD9olXN1VPsIB3/Kx22HwuYKObs=; b=v1AdXdaKGqb3XywDWl76/HiIsmfFIBwzeC6wNbWrzz6qnU2giXRq39y6ZW4w+yS2T7 KBFdOrhbC9LioC1RZrwdt5C1SQJkrPT+VPUm8aMeAg5cpME84PgZf6SCcUqIrdqCyrCV 7vnaEjp3/TfzmSUgmrkZR46h/f6EM8D2wJ/FjBE1PlVNzRmBaYZdycLjn2G86dgOUwjy DccCkWgSLukCkZtVDzKMGlulNjagrr9ZHeMFeJllNxPIqO71i0Z0CeqJ1rhMQyppwclx V3TWVksvSPLuWrLB3nXHu5WCtwHDZM6f8ltYfDS11q3zoN5VNBo4abvT2aB3DXu7Ptfd Gedg== X-Received: by 10.66.74.10 with SMTP id p10mr6930433pav.68.1360252544673; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 07:55:44 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [10.100.36.101] (li335-136.members.linode.com. [96.126.102.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x2sm46943015paw.8.2013.02.07.07.55.39 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Feb 2013 07:55:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87d2wcb18h.fsf@zigzag.favinet> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.210.51 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:15699 Archived-At: On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 16:19 +0100, Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote: > () Nala Ginrut > () Thu, 07 Feb 2013 21:43:02 +0800 > > @ttn: would you like to post a package to guildhall? ;-) > > Not really. I don't want to invest effort into something i won't be > able to use for the forseeable future, but that will anyway bring its > own set of maintenance demands. On the other hand, if someone sends me > patches to make the distribution more guildhall-friendly (w/o breaking > things for non-guildhall users), i would be happy to install them. > OK, I'll see what I can do. > BTW, i was under the impression that guildhall packages are Scheme only. > If that's the case, Guile-PG, which contains C glue to wrap/expose the > PostgreSQL libpq, among the other (Scheme) modules, is necessarily > disqualified. > Ah~seems it's a nice feature request for guildhall. ;-)