Wrong again. I forget add 'before-print-hook' and *unspecified*
situation.

Resend again.

On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 16:48 +0800, Nala Ginrut wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 16:23 +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
> > On 5 December 2012 15:21, Nala Ginrut <nalaginrut@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi folks!
> > > Here's a patch to add colorized-REPL.
> > 
> > Some comments :-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/module/ice-9/colorized.scm b/module/ice-9/colorized.scm
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..fe42a9a
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/module/ice-9/colorized.scm
> > @@ -0,0 +1,290 @@
> > +;;  Copyright (C) 2012
> > +;;      "Mu Lei" known as "NalaGinrut" <NalaGinrut@gmail.com>
> > +;;  Ragnarok is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
> > +;;  it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> > +;;  the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
> > +;;  (at your option) any later version.
> > 
> > Contributions to GNU must have the copyright assigned to FSF, no?
> > 
> > 
> 
> Oh~I'm very sorry! I just copied the header from one of my project!
> 
> > +  #:use-module (oop goops)
> > 
> > This module seems only used to determine the type of each datum for
> > assigning a colour:
> > 
> > +(define *colorize-list*
> > +  `((,<integer> ,color-integer light-blue)
> > +    (,<char> ,color-char brown)
> > 
> > The datums tested for are all primitives.  For reference, the
> > “class-of” operator is more-or-less equivalent to:
> > 
> >  (cond
> >   ((integer? x) <interge>)
> >   ((char? x) <char>)
> >   …
> > 
> > Is there some advantage to using the GOOPS classes rather than
> > equivalent predicates, which are more universal?  Of course, the order
> > of the tests matters highly in both cases.
> > 
> 
> GOOPS classes covered all the possible types in Guile, and it's easy to
> detect the type of a datum with class-of. I just choose the simplest way
> which I can imagined.
> 
> > 
> > There is already a guile-lib module (ansi term-color) that has a
> > particular syntax and defines the codes.  It would be excellent to
> > make use of it here, or at least share the syntax and avoid some
> > duplication.
> > 
> 
> The code segment of the color is not so big, so I write my own. 
> And it's not easy to do a quick hack with mixing other guy's code.
> For a quick hack, and it's simple, so I have no time to care about
> reusing other's work. I don't think it's proper to use (ansi term-color)
> purposely, since it's not in Guile.
> 
> 
> PS: A fixed patch attached.
> > 
> > Regards
> > 
>