From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: nalaginrut Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Guile Lua Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:40:38 +0800 Organization: HFG Message-ID: <1353465638.5256.75.camel@Renee-desktop.suse> References: <87d2zc6vla.fsf@googlemail.com> <1353292230.5256.23.camel@Renee-desktop.suse> <87lidxti7b.fsf@gnu.org> <1353387049.5256.64.camel@Renee-desktop.suse> <87fw44qk83.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1353465659 17080 80.91.229.3 (21 Nov 2012 02:40:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 02:40:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ian Price , guile-devel@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 21 03:41:09 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tb0FJ-0008DN-BI for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 03:41:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45835 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tb0F9-00084i-08 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:40:51 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60532) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tb0F5-00084d-D7 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:40:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tb0F4-0000Dg-70 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:40:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pb0-f41.google.com ([209.85.160.41]:55815) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tb0F2-0000CR-Hn; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:40:44 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pb0-f41.google.com with SMTP id xa7so4950091pbc.0 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 18:40:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:content-type:x-mailer:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=02+2R3RoeawySSh/m/qVt0BWrcEG+HUCXQUI29lRSjY=; b=BBZ2m3lxJ6xMSZUv7tdddPuxe6dYrVlSOHaVtjqb8pgmtTlhBGGUY4RKwGx5zeYcpD qZzQjZrSMuOf4zbB8x/sKYMyj+OaJ0yYsSgBkWNXesb+ATLZ75YJoLZUXX6olgutfVHI 2wErovDmvXNNJ8LbP/hViRtswkTU1/z99TFcO8VbikVBPiuK1m/+vyEQk+u1xBNxTmge 3H8U2jQ+ZcD3fnjCJF2BDUA89HlO1PRscV1BL5BrSzRzKdejALSVCJ5875uMVvMuoWjB OpOxtw6oNYNHcoEgo9pORsKvDOjmIXJFwhEttC1bHnd4+W6bVP3LLMCWbcNsy2HV95qC qGFA== Original-Received: by 10.68.225.232 with SMTP id rn8mr54982444pbc.34.1353465643702; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 18:40:43 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [147.2.147.112] ([61.14.130.226]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id os5sm9044728pbc.15.2012.11.20.18.40.40 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 20 Nov 2012 18:40:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87fw44qk83.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.160.41 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:15222 Archived-At: On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 18:04 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi! > > nalaginrut skribis: > > > @ludo: Thanks! I'll try to do it follow your steps. > > Besides, do we have the final conclusion for the multi-lang choosing > > approach, say, --lang=lua/elisp or #lang lua or a script: > > guile-lua/guile-elisp... whatever. IIRC, ijp raised such a topic, but it > > seems no conclusion. > > I ask this because there should be an easy way to test some big code > > segment written in other language. > > This can achieved with a simple wrapper script. Do we need a standard > executable or command-line option for this? > Yes, I need such a thing, since I'll test other and try new language either. But as ijp pointed out, this may not solve easily, and it's been discussion. So would you please give me a temporary method to run non-scheme script file with Guile? > Ludo’.