From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: nalaginrut Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Guile Lua Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:30:30 +0800 Organization: HFG Message-ID: <1353292230.5256.23.camel@Renee-desktop.suse> References: <87d2zc6vla.fsf@googlemail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1353292245 14820 80.91.229.3 (19 Nov 2012 02:30:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 02:30:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Ian Price Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 19 03:30:56 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TaH8Q-0003cD-0q for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 03:30:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40340 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TaH8F-0005Lt-Sj for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 21:30:43 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42912) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TaH8B-0005Lc-Av for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 21:30:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TaH88-0006v3-8a for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 21:30:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-f41.google.com ([209.85.220.41]:56720) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TaH88-0006uw-2B for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 21:30:36 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id fa10so3180035pad.0 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 18:30:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:content-type:x-mailer:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=U20sQJV+lpP0oN0zg5VKwnxA+JaFvK/a0iXQ79+OlH8=; b=lIrCIpm3eFehbGEzYAT/585qCmxbYfk+0aHIps7KSHC++ZB0zS4tW2AO80qsawj4HR HP5wuRXSt67vFADRBk7tgNE9JzyZ2IsDj8OFBGAMPS2EW4hujjJUr5mxA1i+qn6RN5ia HmEqg1nynebGrQn0TWQa7GP/kZo10Cu/wfmgoMrETMsNl4uegvRJbXiwh6vICKpbbgkH i6qkKSBdaEJok64D9ATz8U4MHrpu4CHWxxhgMXWXzgTULoQ+D3/cdkaTDMfVSUr3tClM P+dBA84u1zAL3aPYbKDgh4vJHPHHep+comxdChHfYj5tivExU1McA0LeghlqFlCuDhOg aJRQ== Original-Received: by 10.68.231.41 with SMTP id td9mr29110182pbc.128.1353292234814; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 18:30:34 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [147.2.147.112] ([61.14.130.226]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id uh10sm5336234pbc.35.2012.11.18.18.30.31 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 18 Nov 2012 18:30:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87d2zc6vla.fsf@googlemail.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.220.41 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:15208 Archived-At: On Sat, 2012-11-17 at 16:30 +0000, Ian Price wrote: > About two weeks ago, I emailed "Phil", who had shown some interest in > hacking guile lua a while back. I still haven't heard back from him, nor > has that branch been touched in 18 months, so I think we can safely say > we need a new maintainer for it. > > I have little knowledge of lua, so I can't really do it, but if you know > anyone who likes lua, and would be willing to hack on it, please suggest > it to them. It'd be a shame to see that code go to waste. > I'm interested on our multi-language feature. And I wish Guile become the real dynamic language compiler collection someday, which mean we need to add more workable languages. I'd like to know what work should the maintainer take? As I know there's some work has been done, but it didn't merge into stable-2.0. What's the rest work? Does it work now? > Wingo, Ludovic > I hope this isn't too forward of me. >