From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: nalaginrut Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: regexp-split for Guile Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 08:30:42 +0800 Organization: HFG Message-ID: <1348014642.2333.10.camel@Renee-SUSE.suse> References: <20120917140133.GA6315@yarrow> <1347973173.2333.3.camel@Renee-SUSE.suse> <20120918195515.GD6315@yarrow> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1348014656 9925 80.91.229.3 (19 Sep 2012 00:30:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 00:30:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: "Chris K. Jester-Young" Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 19 02:31:00 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TE8Bu-0000Fm-2D for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 02:30:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45397 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TE8Bp-0005nh-Rq for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:30:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58256) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TE8Bl-0005nB-HB for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:30:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TE8Bk-0007gd-GQ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:30:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pb0-f41.google.com ([209.85.160.41]:59691) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TE8Bk-0007gV-4u for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:30:48 -0400 Original-Received: by pbbro12 with SMTP id ro12so1292466pbb.0 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:30:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:content-type:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; bh=pLcMAziVLV6cXn+4O+irD6qWvM0wLPVdmv/ULM6OZHo=; b=vesmZvhvE4foLgOAT+jKARkRcpclq0tM5j7dOHEqiYQjBr1UvSQnMgyxjmsr2zwnqv PziEnlEATdRIUbC1+R5dG2fcs9P8uOSTDGTsvJmwIzYRY4n811j9DhLF7JAoBrN8E2hf X2VsDJzSiz0JM+25s8sLYtOQGgYmUEY6p6zr0Juz+2xJkbG7Yv6XaoiYkwJV8uyWvHH4 VPluybFj4nRYzPSm/oKTVvFXG0Fx81Sc6454rURBh109uKboUgPkirMYB7vkZzFKVXNn 3N9FLcP/UZ9NudumLjoZ0E2y7O2oWkyacYWVTv5XV+gjxLsLAgL4VBP5aKoFigyYP/cB GigA== Original-Received: by 10.66.89.37 with SMTP id bl5mr2644990pab.55.1348014647158; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:30:47 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.100.104] ([113.118.93.177]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id iq1sm804009pbc.37.2012.09.18.17.30.44 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:30:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120918195515.GD6315@yarrow> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.85.160.41 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:14898 Archived-At: On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 15:55 -0400, Chris K. Jester-Young wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 08:59:33PM +0800, nalaginrut wrote: > > Anyway, if there're so many people like this nice thing, why not we add > > it (at any option of these three implementations) into ice-9? > > Oh noes! This is where the bikeshedding begins. ;-) > > Seriously, I do think having a regexp-split in (ice-9 regex) would be > good. The question is what interface is best. The one I presented is > a Perl-style one (as also used in Ruby and Java), which is easy to use, > easy to learn (if you come from one of those languages), and easy to > implement. So do we go with it, or do people have a better idea? > Yeah~my version is Python-style, but I don't stick to any specific style. Anyway, my opinion is "we do need a such thing". ;-D > Cheers, > Chris. >