Re: Adding to guile curly-infix (SRFI 105), neoteric- & sweet-expressions

[nalaginrut <nalaginrut@gmail.com>]

hi Wheeler!
I ever port the sweet-expression as a language module for Guile, and I
have such an honor to say it's based on your work. 
There're still some bugs I need to face. But it works fine already.
https://gitorious.org/nacre/guile-sweet

Anyway, I'd like to see it becomes SRFIs. I've proposed it to be one of
official language module since there's multi-language feature in
Guile-2.x.
And it's more convenient to do that if we make sweet-expression the
SRFIs. 



On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 13:02 -0400, David A. Wheeler wrote: 
> All:
> 
> I'd really like feedback on proposed new SRFIs, and I'd like to help get these SRFIs implemented in guile.
> 
> Background: The "readable" group has developed and refined 3 new reader abbreviations for Scheme: curly-infix-, neoteric-, and sweet-expressions.  Each builds on the previous one; details are here:
>   http://readable.sourceforge.net
> 
> We plan to submit all three abbreviations as three separate SRFIs.   The first one, curly-infix-expressions, is new draft SRFI 105, and we'd ESPECIALLY like comments on that:
>   http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-105/
> 
> The whole point of a SRFI is to get it *implemented*, so if you have a comment (such as a *problem* with them or getting any of them implemented in guile), please let us know!!  The best way to comment is the mailing lists (for the SRFIs or via readable.sourceforge.net), so that everyone can discuss and address them.
> 
> Also, I'd be happy to help get these implemented as part of guile.  We have a current implementation that builds on *top* of guile (by completely re-implementing the reader), but it'd far better to have these built-in.
> 
> Thanks for your time!
> 
> --- David A. Wheeler
>