From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: nalaginrut Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: redoing SCM representation in 2.2 Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 19:12:33 +0800 Organization: HFG Message-ID: <1305198753.2392.5.camel@Renee-desktop> References: Reply-To: NalaGinrut@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1305198783 13518 80.91.229.12 (12 May 2011 11:13:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 11:13:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 12 13:12:57 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QKTpB-0008CM-Dg for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:12:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33043 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKTpA-0004Do-JQ for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 07:12:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43741) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKTp5-0004DG-Kz for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 07:12:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKTp1-0004Nb-Mk for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 07:12:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-px0-f171.google.com ([209.85.212.171]:58123) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKTp1-0004NH-D3 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 07:12:47 -0400 Original-Received: by pxi7 with SMTP id 7so1016589pxi.30 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 04:12:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to :references:content-type:organization:date:message-id:mime-version :x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qpdO82N9AemrnoGOiOxZl6sX3krSbm1sZXx40p/D8ws=; b=f7aJDLGg9hVVgmO7yvY949QLtpkAgY96JYPcLATHJWG0xqGUQQH6KrvPwBqht+qp7C 4LapsiGoVv1XBnWiiPdd+vTg4/Ffx3JcO7IUNfpPVeajscPilnGnpdyZc2iJ9SJcLAVA uCB7sjKqNncjDeMTs3vE/SizX07PrFZQwcXbQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type :organization:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding; b=uwGNuaOjnUJuRi56um9BfAMbiq3rilGvZTeIP7fU0wWkbHXy0ir4SITEFff/o/ZX4x 3mD6415q05maOLmZJRFkRHzqrQgzf+WtWRwyjDffsWnu6KdtEFj0UgqvF8uXQAALi5iR kjKHRrZgoO5cbv+joILSesKm1HYYDdIwii50Y= Original-Received: by 10.68.40.197 with SMTP id z5mr64931pbk.503.1305198765934; Thu, 12 May 2011 04:12:45 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.100.100] ([183.15.165.238]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t10sm612406pbh.9.2011.05.12.04.12.39 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 12 May 2011 04:12:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.212.171 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:12482 Archived-At: So we'll see a 48-bits solution in 2.2? Sorry I can't say I'm clear since it's a long article. -- GNU Powered it GPL Protected it GOD Blessed it HFG - NalaGinrut --hacker key-- v4sw7CUSMhw6ln6pr8OSFck4ma9u8MLSOFw3WDXGm7g/l8Li6e7t4TNGSb8AGORTDLMen6g6RASZOGCHPa28s1MIr4p-x hackerkey.com ---end key---