From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: nalaginrut Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: New feature proposal: Support C-code inline? Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 01:04:02 +0800 Organization: HFG Message-ID: <1304615043.2000.36.camel@Renee-desktop> References: <1303293013.2749.41.camel@Renee-desktop> <1303532648.3575.8.camel@Renee-desktop> Reply-To: NalaGinrut@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1304615074 22982 80.91.229.12 (5 May 2011 17:04:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 17:04:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel To: William ML Leslie Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 05 19:04:28 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QI1yQ-0003Z7-GR for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 May 2011 19:04:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56306 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QI1yP-0000SM-W8 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 May 2011 13:04:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47270) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QI1yO-0000SF-6r for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 May 2011 13:04:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QI1yM-0004xy-56 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 May 2011 13:04:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-px0-f171.google.com ([209.85.212.171]:40544) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QI1yM-0004xN-0W for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 May 2011 13:04:18 -0400 Original-Received: by pxi7 with SMTP id 7so1614749pxi.30 for ; Thu, 05 May 2011 10:04:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to :references:content-type:organization:date:message-id:mime-version :x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/lBGfNQqSkBZWVpKp+Q+JofVBxNAAkKaRSb+wuhpww8=; b=USN10mUkKZGEknpLi2X9SWV9j11BUCaOR6F9DJ4QAKkr7h/DVTdJsOsT2zT5/nlSg2 MtAAfp5lIDfFKs+JpsttcCnxxSxlY31f3dev7Ke8lNkUoo1ak4DwvmcjgXCamUY/nsD8 U5MBBejToUfiyEqpUFCxYuLaPdYe3MDyGbjZE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type :organization:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding; b=Cfx8C85UBJ0mgRLihq8SDAEvED4ARLbMlQ/U4Yl+0TfHPOHRDbZzidrchy015vAj5w jpiZkLu0CMCEyUUlP76jqQ0DrFO9/l+bftRpoudMOSvzGRuKmKXJijUTyT/LMpHYTdMf EsbbyM6oFjO9167lysWMz1VReqSaa2OdYV7a0= Original-Received: by 10.68.14.37 with SMTP id m5mr3406130pbc.474.1304615055830; Thu, 05 May 2011 10:04:15 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.100.100] ([183.15.158.21]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v8sm1542264pbk.95.2011.05.05.10.04.10 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 05 May 2011 10:04:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.212.171 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:12432 Archived-At: hi guys. I put this project there: git://gitorious.org/guile-inline/guile-inline.git in case somebody needs it. And fixed some problems. I'll fix the unsigned&pointer problem if I get some free time. to Leslie: > * AOT will get you half way there. In embedded systems it may be > entirely suitable, but those environments are also the ones where > whole-program compilation is possible. Yes, I think you're correct. Maybe we won't need C-inline anymore with AOT compiler. The "C-inline acceleration" could be a delusion in that case. -- GNU Powered it GPL Protected it GOD Blessed it HFG - NalaGinrut --hacker key-- v4sw7CUSMhw6ln6pr8OSFck4ma9u8MLSOFw3WDXGm7g/l8Li6e7t4TNGSb8AGORTDLMen6g6RASZOGCHPa28s1MIr4p-x hackerkey.com ---end key---