From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: cross building 1.9.14 for mingw Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:02:44 +0100 Organization: www.AvatarAcademy.nl Message-ID: <1297764164.2325.268.camel@vuurvlieg> References: <1296330082.8111.371.camel@vuurvlieg> <87ipwmlrzg.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1297764951 3016 80.91.229.12 (15 Feb 2011 10:15:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:15:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 15 11:15:46 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PpHwd-0007DD-1m for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:15:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42802 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PpHkD-0006qi-M5 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 05:02:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42821 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PpHkA-0006qQ-Si for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 05:02:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PpHk9-00026A-J6 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 05:02:50 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp-vbr19.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.39]:4784) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PpHk9-00024r-4r; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 05:02:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.112] (peder.onsbrabantnet.nl [88.159.206.46] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr19.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p1FA2jYm081938; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:02:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from janneke-list@xs4all.nl) In-Reply-To: <87ipwmlrzg.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by smtp-vbr19.xs4all.nl id p1FA2jYm081938 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: FreeBSD 4.6-4.9 X-Received-From: 194.109.24.39 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:11634 Archived-At: Ludovic Court=C3=A8s schreef op ma 14-02-2011 om 13:29 [+0100]: > Done. Thanks! > However, we don=E2=80=99t seem to be actually using the =E2=80=98socket= s=E2=80=99 module: IIUC > we should include =E2=80=9Csockets.h=E2=80=9D somewhere and call =E2=80= =98gl_sockets_startup=E2=80=99, > which we don=E2=80=99t do. Am I missing something? It seems you're right, we do need "socket", but "socketS" is not needed. I haven't looked at runtime behaviour; if I remove socket from this list, libguile does not link with gnulib: .libs/socket.o: In function `scm_socket': /home/janneke/vc/gub/target/mingw/src/guile-1.9.15/libguile/socket.c:= 439: undefined reference to `_socket_used_without_requesting_gnulib_modul= e_socket' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Greetings, Jan --=20 Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar=C2=AE http://AvatarAcademy.= nl =20