From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mike Gran Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: master build issue Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:05:24 -0700 Message-ID: <1244171124.2499.7807.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <87eiu07qse.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1244171347 22552 80.91.229.12 (5 Jun 2009 03:09:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 03:09:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Guile Development , Neil Jerram To: Greg Troxel Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 05 05:09:04 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MCPnk-0003kZ-11 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 05:09:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44890 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MCPni-0005Ii-P9 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 23:09:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MCPkM-0001Ty-VC for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 23:05:35 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MCPkL-0001RL-6u for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 23:05:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42469 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MCPkL-0001R7-1v for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 23:05:33 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp110.prem.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([98.136.44.55]:46769) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MCPkK-0003ox-5x for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 23:05:33 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 81706 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2009 03:05:28 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Mime-Version:X-Mailer:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=k3uBXPKomZIx8dtSGHcS/hrIugxWvCV8UVeLFpzLJrIJAJj+eHhhulEh60SVZns3hRYu92E4RyxXLY0s4mvoklPf4Rh7N1oLY929ny96tRZbixBYPgNFzMReTrF0WzgQ2XWl9qauas2SEq5qq3nXdpMTwz030RHmKrHewPhTe9g= ; Original-Received: from ppp-71-140-200-82.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net (spk121@71.140.200.82 with plain) by smtp110.prem.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 04 Jun 2009 20:05:28 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: FzNaA9iswBDuBl1BmgaIRDaP9Q-- X-YMail-OSG: 7AaPCqMVM1n7sfLruGsTMhBKFbSaBFpQ044N_O0Fj9005cZXIDmAEInvyqOtHAzrGCyjd0BbB3t9wYcaGV6mLvVBcV.uvDlwLFAKrpvVua.fp48_krad.CIgCb1O3woYjwhw_EXAhGDvMdMueOIxGRveSA3IR.YWOK24Dh.QY3PsugH9j5ni3L4MdG7JC3v__fX0KzMEMUdPbanjJuhXdjb8kUJFP9tfx9m_bIU9EmDXrGp_GmgnrUpzF.2_ZGX7jul.07ow8vrN9eVOoyeRUvarQg2KA15B_VSSm9GVpNW36hEAmENCfCm_Suah3gmDQK4o X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.5 (2.24.5-1.fc10) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.4) (2) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:8619 Archived-At: > I downloaded it and built on NetBSD/i386 5.0 with > --prefix=/usr/y0/libunistring, and it seems to build fine with no > warnings that I noticed as it scrolled by. Looking at the package, it > looks quite well baked. Despite my initial negative reaction to new > dependencies, this package seems exceptionally well done for one that > has (to me) appeared suddenly. I did get one failure in make check: > It's isn't really a "new" new package. It is a library made from a collection of the string functions provided by Gnulib. If packaging it ended up being a great difficulty, you could end up getting the same functionality by putting the identical Gnulib functions in the ./lib directory of the Guile tarball.