From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mike Gran Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Using libunistring for string comparisons et al Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 17:01:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <118142.11911.qm@web37907.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <336042.33326.qm@web37901.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <878vwgmhah.fsf@netris.org> <511668.33680.qm@web37902.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <87sjuokniq.fsf@netris.org> Reply-To: Mike Gran NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1300233699 24510 80.91.229.12 (16 Mar 2011 00:01:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 00:01:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ludovic_Court=E8s?= , "guile-devel@gnu.org" To: Mark H Weaver Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 16 01:01:35 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PzeBC-00038D-U2 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 01:01:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33324 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PzeBB-0005vx-QS for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:01:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52557 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PzeB8-0005vf-GO for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:01:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PzeB7-0005RR-PC for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:01:30 -0400 Original-Received: from web37907.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.91.169]:36143) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PzeB7-0005Qw-K8 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:01:29 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 11973 invoked by uid 60001); 16 Mar 2011 00:01:28 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1300233688; bh=sHcTPqoBNLjjrUVr7Kn+eLFrPmSCrGuibW4zubsIL3o=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=FV6hVydlLfgUMEibL8rHyvlV8zCdx1kFPZbVH01/Gt8OBoVc/WZZRKpm2aqSOH+gxmMu5Bm8/MtsUT6Ekb59DAawkR26BrXPnT2IZyfRNkAj3hoDx3Aynn5m5Ydyb9RuMUWjORWPJZMxsHLK8MG69050gm0ffd50rFbZreECSzU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=J+bs6dy15+88ryqozeA7H5TVMGf8evvET/Jy6M4Boc7kxVQEAYpre5kdVUj8frjs9fLqrXg8o52JS8YOnsmC6P2bXkygBx1o+KIkhenRyeWNzZ1pG93If2B98yCKGwiaYj21bTuEt55gxB1g2yj/MB/llGbjaUesD2/0vzQCdw4=; X-YMail-OSG: oEXFO.wVM1l5WQPP6F8bjjOQUrLWqA5zxYxeQOKHGU9i5ke zArrTNC6clQdRWjSa2eJPJnwqtZId9EcmX.fJlnYz1WnMraZGZuCTtuJQ0.0 gp_bcdtK7et4Hy6MdS.S_RhWeGyeZj7FbSvXvlKxIiCAMkozmDtokylKLcWk cHv0VrGAV87wDa20r1hh8b98BXgKEH8Pm3MVoMkWkKwsSz.dFCob1oBYXWwa GzEJ_TWOQo59I9oghifi4oiJ8FUvZKuhHe2IdNdaHx_jHGDCgdJ1LxXUQ.OM hPglCw3UgkEdFkv7okIKnhQv1BsBzfnWRpef72lK0XqR7WhcHbRGKr55xpDB tBVROCiwZxVtdGSrb4dz8TNnHBugXNllMcO3_94Ujnw3agc8vGZXiZGFMkE9 . Original-Received: from [207.8.91.2] by web37907.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 17:01:27 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.109.295617 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: FreeBSD 6.x (1) X-Received-From: 209.191.91.169 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:11876 Archived-At: > The reason I am still arguing this point is because I have looked=0A> ser= iously at what I would need to do to (A) fix our i18n problems and=0A> (B) = make the code efficient.=A0 I very much want to fix these things,=0A> but t= he pain of trying to do this with our current scheme is too much=0A> for me= to bear.=A0 I shouldn't have to rewrite libunistring, and I=0A> shouldn't = have to write 3 or 4 different variants of each procedure=0A> that takes tw= o string parameters.=0A=0AWhat=A0procedures are giving incorrect results?= =0A=0AThanks,=0A=0AMike=0A