From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje =?UTF-8?Q?Nik=C5=A1i=C4=87?= Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Building Guile on IA64 HPUX Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:13:31 +0200 Message-ID: <1161846811.23420.31.camel@localhost> References: <1161790284.23420.24.camel@localhost> <873b9crpj1.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1161978380 26531 80.91.229.2 (27 Oct 2006 19:46:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 19:46:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 27 21:46:17 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GdXL1-0003oA-1c for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 21:25:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GdXKz-0003RY-IA for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 15:25:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GczQj-0008AE-Vk for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 03:13:34 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GczQh-00086q-CM for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 03:13:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GczQh-00086L-2N for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 03:13:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [157.247.252.32] (helo=mail2.avl.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GczQg-0006ar-Rj for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 03:13:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mail2.avl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.avl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DF465B330; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:13:30 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from [157.247.180.145] (unknown [157.247.180.145]) by mail2.avl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 925405B1D2; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:13:28 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Neil Jerram In-Reply-To: <873b9crpj1.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 15:25:50 -0400 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:6196 Archived-At: On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 00:36 +0200, Neil Jerram wrote: > > +AC_CHECK_LIB(uca, __uc_get_ar_bsp) > > Is there any point in this check? As far as I can tell we don't use > the result of the check anywhere. We use it for the check's side effect: if libuca exists, it is added to the LIBS. Without -luca, Guile using __uc_get_ar_bsp would not link on HPUX. There are other checks that use the same logic, such as check for connect in -lsocket and for gethostbyname in -lnsl. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel