From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: largefile64 on ports Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 17:13:30 +0200 Message-ID: <1157728410.8233.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <87irjz5ks3.fsf@zip.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1157733265 12293 80.91.229.2 (8 Sep 2006 16:34:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 16:34:25 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 08 18:34:21 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GLjIr-00007p-QZ for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 18:34:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GLjIr-0003dY-3f for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 12:34:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GLjIm-0003Zm-Ur for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 12:34:00 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GLjIk-0003Oz-6N for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 12:34:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GLjIk-0003Oj-3l for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 12:33:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [216.27.85.7] (helo=kettle.ambient-hosting.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GLjJN-0007di-95 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 12:34:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ambient.dashsystems.com [216.27.85.7]) by kettle.ambient-hosting.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 246D98800F for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2006 12:33:54 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87irjz5ks3.fsf@zip.com.au> X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.0 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:6068 Archived-At: Hi Kevin, On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 09:17 +1000, Kevin Ryde wrote: > Actually instantiating a port from a descriptor isn't documented, so > it's possible no applications are using the C port type stuff at all! Guile-gnome's gnome-vfs wrapper uses it. You can make a SCM port out of a gnome-vfs handle and access the gnome-vfs handle associated with a port. I don't think that we rely on the size though -- the port is made via scm_make_port_type, and the vmethods are set via the setters. The patch does not look like it would cause us problems. Regards, Andy. -- http://wingolog.org/ _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel