From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Default stack limit Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:31:04 +0200 Message-ID: <1147271464.23680.140.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <3E76C952D0DE7C18F2E3A89F@cadabra-sw.stanford.edu> <87acatj19q.fsf@laas.fr> <87hd5111mz.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <8656DB86D246C1D9ACD84549@tribes2.stanford.edu> <87zmirvoew.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <20060505140534.GA13293@bordell.redhat.usu> <20060506111221.GA16844@bordell.redhat.usu> <87slnljzgj.fsf@minimini.mvo.home> <1147084130.23680.94.camel@localhost.localdomain> <87k68wjib9.fsf@minimini.mvo.home> <87y7xbn15u.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <1147181025.23680.99.camel@localhost.localdomain> <87bqu6kext.fsf_-_@minimini.mvo.home> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1147271511 15464 80.91.229.2 (10 May 2006 14:31:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 14:31:51 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 10 16:31:46 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fdpif-0002lJ-Qj for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:31:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fdpif-0005Hr-BP for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:31:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fdpia-0005He-Tq for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:31:12 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FdpiZ-0005Gx-8u for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:31:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FdpiZ-0005Gu-6f for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:31:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [216.27.85.7] (helo=kettle.ambient-hosting.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Fdpjr-0007uX-Sf for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:32:32 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kettle.ambient-hosting.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B95788006 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:31:05 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87bqu6kext.fsf_-_@minimini.mvo.home> X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5919 Archived-At: Hi, On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 01:31 +0300, Marius Vollmer wrote: > Andy Wingo writes: > > > Speaking of which, a -g compile on PPC uses quite a lot of stack -- I > > had to up the default limit in order to get anything to work (for > > example, compiling psyntax). That would be another issue though... > > Yeah, it's a "known issue" also on x86. The default stack limit is a > bit tight for a "-O0" build. I guess we should just double it or > something. Or should we make the default 'unlimited'? I think that 50000 words (200KB/400KB) should be more than enough for anyone. Haha. (Right now it is 20000 words.) Seriously, we should look into why this is the case, has SCM had similar issues with newer GCC, etc. Is it just the compilers that changed, or was it frames, or ... Regards, -- Andy Wingo http://wingolog.org/ _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel