From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: guile 1.8 and x86_64 Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 12:28:50 +0200 Message-ID: <1147084130.23680.94.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <3E76C952D0DE7C18F2E3A89F@cadabra-sw.stanford.edu> <87acatj19q.fsf@laas.fr> <87hd5111mz.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <8656DB86D246C1D9ACD84549@tribes2.stanford.edu> <87zmirvoew.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <20060505140534.GA13293@bordell.redhat.usu> <20060506111221.GA16844@bordell.redhat.usu> <87slnljzgj.fsf@minimini.mvo.home> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1147084177 26609 80.91.229.2 (8 May 2006 10:29:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 10:29:37 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 08 12:29:34 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fd2zX-0003SJ-Ev for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 May 2006 12:29:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fd2zW-0000yX-Ti for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 May 2006 06:29:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fd2zU-0000yI-8N for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 May 2006 06:29:24 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fd2zS-0000y6-5O for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 May 2006 06:29:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fd2zS-0000y3-2E for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 May 2006 06:29:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [216.27.85.7] (helo=kettle.ambient-hosting.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Fd30G-0001LU-Gi for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 May 2006 06:30:12 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kettle.ambient-hosting.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A4688005 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 06:28:50 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87slnljzgj.fsf@minimini.mvo.home> X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5912 Archived-At: Hi, On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 00:29 +0300, Marius Vollmer wrote: > 137c137 > < #define CELL_P(x) (SCM_ITAG3 (x) =3D=3D scm_tc3_cons) > --- > > #define CELL_P(x) ((SCM_UNPACK(x) & (sizeof(scm_t_cell)-1)) =3D=3D s= cm_tc3_cons) I don't really understand how the region can give you unaligned pointers, but I do confirm that this patch allows me to build guile. Rock! Running make check stops with compilation errors of the form: test-conversion.c:32: warning: format =E2=80=98%Ld=E2=80=99 expects type = =E2=80=98long long int=E2=80=99, but argument 4 has type =E2=80=98scm_t_intmax=E2=80=99 There are about 20 of these: http://paste.lisp.org/display/19791 I don't have time to look at this atm, just wanted to give the quick positive feedback :-) Cheers, --=20 Andy Wingo http://wingolog.org/ _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel