From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: 1.8 status and 64-bit data corruption Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:07:42 +0200 Message-ID: <1143626862.5187.115.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <87d5g98ibo.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87fyl2i8yw.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1143627157 10018 80.91.229.2 (29 Mar 2006 10:12:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 10:12:37 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 29 12:12:35 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FOXfE-0003Rf-Vz for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:12:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FOXfE-0001eC-BF for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 05:12:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FOXf1-0001ZI-HV for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 05:12:19 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FOXez-0001Y0-9j for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 05:12:18 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FOXez-0001Xl-1q for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 05:12:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [216.27.85.7] (helo=kettle.ambient-hosting.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FOXgu-0001iZ-G2 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 05:14:16 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kettle.ambient-hosting.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 803AC88006 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 05:11:58 -0500 (EST) Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87fyl2i8yw.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5824 Archived-At: Hi Neil, On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 21:56 +0100, Neil Jerram wrote: > The gcc on this machine is: > > neil@we:~/guile-core-1.8-20060328$ gcc --version > gcc (GCC) 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-13) I got different results when using gcc 3.3. Can't remember exactly how different tho :-/ The gcc I normally use is 4.0.3. I just reproduced the bug with that gcc and latest guile, running with the default cflags (-g -O2). The error is highly dependent on cflags tho. Regards, -- Andy Wingo http://wingolog.org/ _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel