From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Finally ready to talk more substantively about 1.9 (and tng). Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 19:44:11 +0100 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <1084041850.14533.15.camel@localhost> References: <87llk55zpw.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <87smedeagi.fsf@ivanova.rotty.yi.org> <1084041609.14317.13.camel@localhost> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1084262847 25628 80.91.224.253 (11 May 2004 08:07:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 08:07:27 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 11 10:07:22 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BNSIM-0001hD-00 for ; Tue, 11 May 2004 10:07:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BNSHK-0003x6-F5 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 May 2004 04:06:18 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BNSFo-0003af-2d for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 May 2004 04:04:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BNSFD-0003OG-L2 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 May 2004 04:04:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [216.166.232.203] (helo=johnson-resources.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1BNSCs-0002UU-Rh for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 May 2004 04:01:42 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (mantis.schoolnet.na [::ffff:196.44.140.238]) (AUTH: LOGIN wingo) by johnson-resources.com with esmtp; Tue, 11 May 2004 03:56:36 -0400 Original-Received: from wingo by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1BMWnz-0003mt-00 for ; Sat, 08 May 2004 19:44:11 +0100 Original-To: guile-devel In-Reply-To: <1084041609.14317.13.camel@localhost> X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3701 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3701 Copying to guile-devel to show my ignorance to all! On Sat, 2004-05-08 at 19:40, Andy Wingo wrote: > Hey, > > On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 18:23, Andreas Rottmann wrote: > > > (for-each (lambda (f) (close f)) items) > > > > This should be (for-each (lambda (file) (close file)) items) > > Or, as a bikeshed, (for-each close files). > > > I agree that these names are a bit overly generic. I'll quote the list > > of maybe too generic (g-wrap) exports here, so we can discuss about > > name changes. > > > > description > > typespec > > c-name > > argument-count input-argument-count optional-argument-count > > arguments argument-types > > return-type return-typespec > > generic-name > > class-name type options c-type-name all-types add-option! > > OK, another nitpick. GTK is where I'm most familiar with generic > functions. When they have getters, they use `get-' before the name. It > is a mental clue that the function is a generic. It's not so schemy, but > then, generic functions aren't all that schemy either. And of course > `get-' doesn't make sense as an accessor. Perhaps then you should be > using slot-set!, etc anyway. Just a thought. > > Cheers, -- Andy Wingo _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel