From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bruno Victal Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Replacing Guile test-suite with SRFI-64? Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 13:25:49 +0100 Message-ID: <0eccfb2e-c6c8-43f8-a33b-c6b3358fdd49@makinata.eu> References: <87h6nlyryy.fsf@makinata.eu> <1556798849.3129037.1695482003526@mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18713"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cc: "guile-devel@gnu.org" To: Mike Gran Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 26 14:27:05 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ql79d-0004fK-Lm for guile-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 14:27:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ql798-0004nJ-7K; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 08:26:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ql793-0004mG-Ue for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 08:26:30 -0400 Original-Received: from smtpmciv4.myservices.hosting ([185.26.107.240]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ql78g-0004T2-DX for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 08:26:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mail1.netim.hosting (unknown [185.26.106.173]) by smtpmciv4.myservices.hosting (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB3E20765; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 14:26:01 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail1.netim.hosting (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD43800A0; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 14:25:50 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail1.netim.hosting Original-Received: from mail1.netim.hosting ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail1-2.netim.hosting [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id msnRUECg-gTg; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 14:25:50 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.116] (unknown [10.192.1.83]) (Authenticated sender: lumen@makinata.eu) by mail1.netim.hosting (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1705A800A4; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 14:25:50 +0200 (CEST) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <1556798849.3129037.1695482003526@mail.yahoo.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.26.107.240; envelope-from=mirai@makinata.eu; helo=smtpmciv4.myservices.hosting X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.devel:21993 Archived-At: Hi Mike, On 2023-09-23 16:13, Mike Gran wrote: > And personally, I find that errors in srfi-64 tests are more difficult to interpret > that errors in the guile test suite framework. The logging is worse. If I'm not mistaken the logging behavior can be customized by writing your own SRFI-64 test runner. (as an example Guix does this in [1]) [1]: -- Furthermore, I consider that nonfree software must be eradicated. Cheers, Bruno.