unofficial mirror of guile-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>
To: Stefan Israelsson Tampe <stefan.itampe@gmail.com>,
	guile-devel <guile-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: hastbables in scheme, are they slow? using goops is this madness
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 08:14:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <07c1258b2e3695c065dd3e9ff1dceff2a2eef519.camel@telenet.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGua6m1T__jWbDfSnbj=Gx97adaM1a2Npst9LvhvpK_C39SpgA@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 699 bytes --]

Stefan Israelsson Tampe schreef op di 22-02-2022 om 00:05 [+0100]:
> 2. For very large hash tables C based solutions are about 1.5-2.0
> faster. 
> (for-each (lambda (i) (hashq-set! h i i)) (iota 20000000))

For what sizes is Scheme faster, and for what sizes is Scheme faster?
Where is the cut-off point?

Also, seems quite nice.  While I haven't had noticed performance
problems yet with C hashtables, the Scheme implementation would
eliminate the problem of 'hash-for-each' forming a continuation
barrier.

> LICENSE
> LGPL v2 or v3

Guile is LGPL2+, so to be eventually integrated into Guile, shouldn't
it to LGPL2+ (there might eventually be a LGPLv4)?

Greetings,
Maxime.

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 260 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2022-02-22  7:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-21 23:05 hastbables in scheme, are they slow? using goops is this madness Stefan Israelsson Tampe
2022-02-22  7:14 ` Maxime Devos [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=07c1258b2e3695c065dd3e9ff1dceff2a2eef519.camel@telenet.be \
    --to=maximedevos@telenet.be \
    --cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=stefan.itampe@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).