From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lynn Winebarger Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: memoization and error messages Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 19:09:21 -0500 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <02120219092102.12810@locke.free-expression.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1038874760 13630 80.91.224.249 (3 Dec 2002 00:19:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 00:19:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tomas@fabula.de, guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18J0mT-0003Xa-00 for ; Tue, 03 Dec 2002 01:19:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18J0kJ-0003Ac-00; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 19:17:03 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18J0jk-000345-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 19:16:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18J0ji-00033k-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 19:16:27 -0500 Original-Received: from plounts.uits.indiana.edu ([129.79.1.73]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18J0ji-00032x-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 19:16:26 -0500 Original-Received: from fontz.uits.indiana.edu (fontz.uits.indiana.edu [129.79.1.76]) by plounts.uits.indiana.edu (8.12.1/8.12.1/IUPO) with ESMTP id gB30GIAB007896; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 19:16:19 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from locke.free-expression.org (dial-117-185.dial.indiana.edu [156.56.117.185]) by fontz.uits.indiana.edu (8.12.1/8.12.1/IUPO) with SMTP id gB30GFQs005551; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 19:16:16 -0500 (EST) Original-To: Daniel Skarda <0rfelyus@ucw.cz>, Dirk Herrmann X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] In-Reply-To: Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1775 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1775 On Monday 02 December 2002 15:45, Daniel Skarda wrote: > > R5RS does allow macro and variable of the same name - in a sense. For > > example: > > First I must say I have to add "read R5RS more carefully" to my TODO list :) > > As my quick survey revealed, this macro part of R5RS is not consistently > implemented in most scheme implementations - in my opinion it shows that there > is something bad in R5RS. Or maybe it's just that hygienic macros are more difficult to implement than non-hygienic macro systems. Lynn _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel