From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lynn Winebarger Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: bug in syncase Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 04:29:36 -0500 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <0211150429361N.07034@locke.free-expression.org> References: <200211142310.17723.clinton@unknownlamer.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1037353828 11589 80.91.224.249 (15 Nov 2002 09:50:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:50:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18Cd7G-00030A-00 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:50:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18Cd8e-00036m-00; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 04:51:48 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 18CctV-0005oz-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 04:36:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 18CctS-0005oU-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 04:36:08 -0500 Original-Received: from julesburg.uits.indiana.edu ([129.79.1.75]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18CctS-0005oL-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 04:36:06 -0500 Original-Received: from fontz.uits.indiana.edu (fontz.uits.indiana.edu [129.79.1.76]) by julesburg.uits.indiana.edu (8.12.1/8.12.1/IUPO) with ESMTP id gAF9a1Fa012523; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 04:36:01 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from locke.free-expression.org (dial-122-54.dial.indiana.edu [156.56.122.54]) by fontz.uits.indiana.edu (8.12.1/8.12.1/IUPO) with SMTP id gAF9ZwGK021976; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 04:35:59 -0500 (EST) Original-To: Clinton Ebadi , Dirk Herrmann , Marius Vollmer X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] In-Reply-To: <200211142310.17723.clinton@unknownlamer.org> Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1710 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1710 On Thursday 14 November 2002 23:10, Clinton Ebadi wrote: > On Thursday 14 November 2002 06:59, Dirk Herrmann wrote: > > the separation of memoization and execution is going forward. However, > > there is one thing that I cannot solve by myself (or at least, which would > > take me too long). Guile now does not accept the following any more: > > > > guile> define > > ERROR: In procedure expression: > > ERROR: Misplaced syntactic keyword > > ABORT: (misc-error) > > That shouldn't be a bug. In every other scheme system that is a perfectly > valid statement since there are no "magic" operators in Scheme. I don't see > the advantage of making it impossible to do things like this. Guile should be > fixed, not syncase. > Nonsense. Here's the response in Petite Chez Scheme: > define Error: invalid syntax define. Type (debug) to enter the debugger. > What scheme systems are you refering to? Lynn _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel