From: Lynn Winebarger <owinebar@free-expression.org>
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug in syncase
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 04:29:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0211150429361N.07034@locke.free-expression.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200211142310.17723.clinton@unknownlamer.org>
On Thursday 14 November 2002 23:10, Clinton Ebadi wrote:
> On Thursday 14 November 2002 06:59, Dirk Herrmann wrote:
> > the separation of memoization and execution is going forward. However,
> > there is one thing that I cannot solve by myself (or at least, which would
> > take me too long). Guile now does not accept the following any more:
> >
> > guile> define
> > ERROR: In procedure expression:
> > ERROR: Misplaced syntactic keyword
> > ABORT: (misc-error)
>
> That shouldn't be a bug. In every other scheme system that is a perfectly
> valid statement since there are no "magic" operators in Scheme. I don't see
> the advantage of making it impossible to do things like this. Guile should be
> fixed, not syncase.
>
Nonsense. Here's the response in Petite Chez Scheme:
> define
Error: invalid syntax define.
Type (debug) to enter the debugger.
>
What scheme systems are you refering to?
Lynn
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-15 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-14 11:59 bug in syncase Dirk Herrmann
2002-11-15 4:10 ` Clinton Ebadi
2002-11-15 9:29 ` Lynn Winebarger [this message]
2002-11-15 9:34 ` Lynn Winebarger
2002-11-15 19:25 ` Neil Jerram
2002-11-16 18:39 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-11-17 10:54 ` Neil Jerram
2002-11-17 20:07 ` Marius Vollmer
[not found] <Pine.GSO.4.05.10211161811180.9959-100000@sallust.ida.ing.tu-bs.de>
2002-11-17 12:11 ` Neil Jerram
2002-11-20 17:33 ` Dirk Herrmann
2002-11-21 17:53 ` Dirk Herrmann
2002-11-21 20:22 ` Neil Jerram
2002-11-23 10:53 ` Dirk Herrmann
2002-11-24 9:25 ` Neil Jerram
2002-11-24 10:33 ` Dirk Herrmann
2002-12-04 1:12 ` Rob Browning
2002-11-23 13:01 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-12-04 18:27 ` Carl R. Witty
2002-12-04 20:54 ` Neil Jerram
2002-12-09 20:28 ` Carl R. Witty
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0211150429361N.07034@locke.free-expression.org \
--to=owinebar@free-expression.org \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).