From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lynn Winebarger Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: define and modules Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 02:16:54 -0500 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <0211060216541H.07034@locke.free-expression.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1036574964 4165 80.91.224.249 (6 Nov 2002 09:29:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 09:29:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 189MV0-000153-00 for ; Wed, 06 Nov 2002 10:29:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 189MRk-0002Pl-00; Wed, 06 Nov 2002 04:26:00 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 189KWt-0005ew-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2002 02:23:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 189KWp-0005eW-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2002 02:23:09 -0500 Original-Received: from rockridge.uits.indiana.edu ([129.79.1.74]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 189KWn-0005dt-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2002 02:23:06 -0500 Original-Received: from fontz.uits.indiana.edu (fontz.uits.indiana.edu [129.79.1.76]) by rockridge.uits.indiana.edu (8.12.1/8.12.1/IUPO) with ESMTP id gA67N02U025347; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 02:23:01 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from locke.free-expression.org (dial-122-148.dial.indiana.edu [156.56.122.148]) by fontz.uits.indiana.edu (8.12.1/8.12.1/IUPO) with SMTP id gA67MwjK004071; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 02:22:59 -0500 (EST) Original-To: Dirk Herrmann X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] In-Reply-To: Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1648 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1648 On Wednesday 06 November 2002 01:54, Dirk Herrmann wrote: > On 4 Nov 2002, Marius Vollmer wrote: > > > Dirk Herrmann writes: > > > > > OK, talking about the right thing: How should guile react to the > > > following code: > > > > > > (define define-private define) > > > > > > This is done in boot9.scm. Should this be allowed? > > > > No, since 'define' is a syntactic keyword... which is probably not the > > reason you were expecting, right? > > It is exactly the reason. The question is, how should guile react here? "Syntax error: invalid use of define" or "Syntax error: invalid define form"? Lynn _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel