From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lynn Winebarger Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Guile 1.5.8 beta available for testing. Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 11:21:42 -0500 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <0208281121421E.19624@locke.free-expression.org> References: <20020828.153418.104036626.Sven.Hartrumpf@FernUni-Hagen.de> <20020828.163839.74750750.Sven.Hartrumpf@FernUni-Hagen.de> <87lm6r0zfp.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1030551897 20099 127.0.0.1 (28 Aug 2002 16:24:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 16:24:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17k5cg-0005DU-00 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 18:24:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17k5e1-0004BQ-00; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 12:26:13 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17k5dW-0004A0-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 12:25:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17k5dU-00049l-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 12:25:41 -0400 Original-Received: from julesburg.uits.indiana.edu ([129.79.1.75]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17k5dU-00049h-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 12:25:40 -0400 Original-Received: from fontz.uits.indiana.edu (fontz.uits.indiana.edu [129.79.1.76]) by julesburg.uits.indiana.edu (8.12.1/8.12.1/IUPO) with ESMTP id g7SGPaYG028487; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 11:25:36 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from locke.free-expression.org (dial-122-33.dial.indiana.edu [156.56.122.33]) by fontz.uits.indiana.edu (8.12.1/8.12.1/IUPO) with SMTP id g7SGPWhM015664; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 11:25:34 -0500 (EST) Original-To: Marius Vollmer , Sven Hartrumpf X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] In-Reply-To: <87lm6r0zfp.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1176 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1176 On Wednesday 28 August 2002 10:34, Marius Vollmer wrote: > Sven Hartrumpf writes: > > > > I.e., what processes show this behaviour. > > > > A medium-sized program doing lots of symbol, string, and list construction. > > Really GC-intensive programs (around 30% of runtime with bigloo). > > Is that program available somewhere so that we can try it ourselves? > > Looks like a good test case for the GC and maybe we can find a way to > better tune ours. It would be good to know how it behaves with scm, as a point of reference. Lynn _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel