From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: 0e1000 Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:43:09 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20100910215812.M35983@ccrma.Stanford.EDU> <20100911113915.M21472@ccrma.Stanford.EDU> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284288103 16224 80.91.229.12 (12 Sep 2010 10:41:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 10:41:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org To: "Bill Schottstaedt" Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 12 12:41:42 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ouk0D-000508-3J for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:41:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44921 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ouk09-000695-Ol for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 06:41:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55420 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ouk02-0005ob-6d for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 06:41:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OujyY-0003r3-O0 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 06:39:59 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:47826 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OujyY-0003qx-Jt for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 06:39:58 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00CC9D2EDA; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 06:39:58 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=MBu7aW7Z0vvZzVRIwKVUpqDcCJo=; b=nBYpJg R0PL4POtwsixwfRa27iMexNuYmdJIzpduQ7M2sJErgHox24jpjrrHykMfcLW5lKH Yuj3UMwpg5+9DWCspphwUvKWIa4gB6+K2Daco7r0D72P6pXfw+Nw6h1LMagNUdG+ KJ7YG8raHMcT2UDg1GEEE0KKyDwViuv3FmOiY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=KUh7cohIG6wVRQ+Ke2b8COhWUv5QThfo TMnQdoVjgsRD6mgK3mYYX5XcTU/mXDmeQ3vWXKyzyG+N0sQKVImuDAO2/qJgDnm+ v9nsHUqtmA4fpt2itgCkhQeA+rdxEUV6UCBLmon4qVXsbZE/Zkxo0onRwT12v963 v9KAJZYizAI= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2609D2ED9; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 06:39:56 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [83.44.190.100]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 53484D2ED8; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 06:39:55 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20100911113915.M21472@ccrma.Stanford.EDU> (Bill Schottstaedt's message of "Sat, 11 Sep 2010 04:41:49 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 15F2F80A-BE5A-11DF-B591-030CEE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:4801 Archived-At: On Sat 11 Sep 2010 13:41, "Bill Schottstaedt" writes: >> This N=0 case is special though, because the number is in fact >> representable. But I'm not sure that matters. I am inclined to punt on >> this issue; what do you think? > > I thought it would make you guys smile. It did, once I realized what was going on. Cheers for pointing me to yet another part of Guile's code that I didn't understand :) Andy -- http://wingolog.org/