From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: quote oddity Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 02:19:24 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20110401213750.M91783@ccrma.Stanford.EDU> <20110401222925.RGC7T.52485.root@cdptpa-web26-z01> <20110401224911.M70351@ccrma.Stanford.EDU> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301703583 17348 80.91.229.12 (2 Apr 2011 00:19:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 00:19:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org To: "Bill Schottstaedt" Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 02 02:19:36 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5oYw-0000tf-Sv for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 02:19:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37933 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q5oYw-0005ea-27 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 20:19:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36301 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q5oYm-0005dr-Sb for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 20:19:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5oYk-0000Fx-IG for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 20:19:24 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:41889 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5oYk-0000FC-Fp for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 20:19:22 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7BA753BE; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 20:21:07 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=/50VsV9UyVb0XxRlCPRX/bLbtGQ=; b=fECdD5 tm1h83nDuzyVmwOW8N9DcRnQtEzW6fsSKFaa802B+t7Cs/chAI/wXegqp2A3Zw7C X3gs4eBYFHV6cbdaQij5JpPcUgPzNr/UagRKq2nnFCVOTXxtvJS+IHYmT1HZ4+BU IVurESuA6MDynaRBOFuVWc4Zdy94cHr2MNiyg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=p58ru+z32hZrA4pTee/apQ9Jkgcgveqq cfIAtRjQ4Zcfp5cEbDjTrznTDog5FCTfF2xyBEaMkfxAnDylFW9nUk09agQ3GheN ExgDAK5HhcSvE/cRFiRgG9bDtTFe5K7PEDOjjg4VqlT9i5URVDCIeQ2HvdcWRTa1 9PtXoh1Oawo= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2D7753BC; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 20:21:04 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C89F553BB; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 20:20:56 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20110401224911.M70351@ccrma.Stanford.EDU> (Bill Schottstaedt's message of "Fri, 1 Apr 2011 15:53:10 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 18CF1A82-5CBF-11E0-AB12-E8AB60295C12-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:5410 Archived-At: On Sat 02 Apr 2011 00:53, "Bill Schottstaedt" writes: >> Well, quote is syntax. You can't pass it around like a function. Guile 2.0 fixes that: > > that's an improvement? I *think* so. I think we can agree that in general uniformity is better, and this case certainly has that property. I don't know how supporting first-class syntax could help anything in this case. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/