From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: guile-2.0.0 fails to build without threads Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 11:55:41 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4D9DCE98.5080808@gentoo.org> <87y63gj765.fsf@rapitore.luna> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1302697020 10932 80.91.229.12 (13 Apr 2011 12:17:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 12:17:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org To: Marco Maggi Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 13 14:16:55 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9z0B-0008T0-L7 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 14:16:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60354 helo=lists2.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9z0B-0003pd-5l for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 08:16:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57416) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9z03-0003lF-9B for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 08:16:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9yzz-0007mO-2I for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 08:16:47 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:32885 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9yzy-0007mC-WC for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 08:16:43 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 841F141B1; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 08:18:40 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=IvEVffcnGmB71jb/Pt3fYvbkSnY=; b=KQYff6 f8pPKwXoGoZfZR5PPGSeY2Aon6VtyzsD2ze7jRJfnipLF/NbKMBwdHDDHVZpgg+V qGs7z4dUFfB+Rpdq4onJZC6ze7b70l1k3HCSDtK2MfSPkBxxLUfGnSglUwT7fLCS sRT66RAC5cZrr6jJzPYiqnOqfYTbUC+q1vPm8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=W5UbZW1ix1tjwKA1m7Yqm/Qs1fgwWpYr zfXCEdnXlH7hpxXXnol5yKaL4Km/92l45QgJ6+CNe2dNHqXVboR9EF1SltujyVjA VGXoxpgiawwO/XtSdwmZDZGzrm3GkyGVr3JcbHh6iGJr6sj0Q4ciq6fqrTKSRbVa oA0duisG4ds= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ECD841AE; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 08:18:38 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CCF5E41AB; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 08:18:36 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87y63gj765.fsf@rapitore.luna> (Marco Maggi's message of "Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:49:22 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 29677B3E-65C8-11E0-A56E-E8AB60295C12-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:5465 Archived-At: Hi Marco, On Tue 12 Apr 2011 08:49, Marco Maggi writes: > I am following up here because I have a problem at the same > point when building branch stable-2.0; I have just fetched > from the repository, so I have the commit c89b452993... Actually, failing at that point is quite common: it's the first time the newly-built Guile is actually used. It would be more appropriate to start a new thread, but since we're here... > scmsigs.c: In function 'signal_delivery_thread': > scmsigs.c:159:3: warning: implicit declaration of function 'GC_pthread_sigm= > ask' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] This is odd. The configure script should detect the presence of GC_pthread_sigmask, and only emit references to it if it is found. Can you grep your config.log for instances of "GC_pthread" ? Also, can you grep your libguile/scmconfig.h for "PTHREAD" ? > memoize.c:478:***Mismatching FUNC_NAME. Should be: `#define FUNC_NAME s_"@= > prompt"' These are harmless, but thank you for being thorough in the report. > Throw without catch before boot: > Throw to key stack-overflow with args (#f "Stack overflow" #f #f)Aborting. Can you submit a backtrace please? You can do so by running meta/gdb-uninstalled-guile --no-auto-compile, then "b scm_ithrow", "run", and then "bt" when the breakpoint hits. Thanks, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/