From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: [1.9.12][OpenBSD] CFLAGS="-g -O0" run time failure ... Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:41:08 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20100908192137.GH8535@x.lence.net> <20100908230628.GB18170@x.lence.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284126121 11711 80.91.229.12 (10 Sep 2010 13:42:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:42:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org To: primus Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 10 15:42:00 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ou3rb-0003GK-25 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 15:41:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38744 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ou3ra-0004K2-J9 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:41:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45104 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ou3qh-0003yC-68 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:41:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ou3qd-0005ln-0q for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:41:03 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:47381 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ou3qc-0005lc-VA for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:40:58 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B246CD46EE; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:40:58 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=Abbnwkd0tEGferC5lTNEw5Otp+g=; b=N2uPnO WR2YnPoaPPaU0IlRqwdWMSGhalGCdVCwEzJMefBhPDvz9FbdCv6um1Doz1ddL8QO FpxJF4v0plc+tySTbdnsTKuLoD1PQXyyzUvYuVSruwQKc9DPlXN5P8/qn6a4EoZ2 lYlOT1PNeTb5+gW99WZkVAYBse6QzidmKEUk4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=GRJy4DhqcGSjxvwrlya+awOlNAl1Y1qx ry+hLF/8hM49muiqvQHZtp03FWaoGhV+/s3VsvFtkd1mGZNSXFaqbcS4eFoFFuk7 fN+BX1WnQpWvy9Eez0DIJtkFVCPpkgN/JNBBKaJiMG0Mcqes8zjCHp/Tyezl90F6 05OW3cxg7SI= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC36D46EC; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:40:57 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [79.156.144.156]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F253AD46EA; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:40:55 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20100908230628.GB18170@x.lence.net> (primus's message of "Thu, 9 Sep 2010 00:06:28 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 0A9C1178-BCE1-11DF-8943-030CEE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:4785 Archived-At: On Thu 09 Sep 2010 01:06, primus writes: >> If you are able to attach to the guile process while it is building, >> break on scm_ithrow and send the backtrace. You can edit >> meta/guile-tools and replace "exec guile" with "exec >> gdb-uninstalled-guile", then when you get a gdb prompt after typing >> "make", you can "break scm_ithrow", then "run", then "bt full" when you >> hit the error. Can you also try "call scm_backtrace ()", please. That will give the Scheme backtrace, if all goes well. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/