From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: Likely bug: SMOBs and mark functions Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:13:15 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20100719-005153.sv1523.70961@savannah.gnu.org> <20100719-005459.sv1523.65271@savannah.gnu.org> <20100719-005950.sv1523.43708@savannah.gnu.org> <20100724-161608.sv15145.2405@savannah.gnu.org> <20110213-185123.sv20118.98931@savannah.gnu.org> <4D5A6A92.1080702@gnu.org> <8739npi9zq.fsf@gnu.org> <4D5AA730.2040706@gnu.org> <871v38cduu.fsf@gnu.org> <4D5CED2D.6090600@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1297949273 6574 80.91.229.12 (17 Feb 2011 13:27:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:27:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org, Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= To: Luca Saiu Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 17 14:27:49 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pq3tc-0006fG-LJ for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:27:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34385 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pq3tc-0000xe-26 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:27:48 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34988 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pq3sC-0007wi-DO for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:26:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pq3sB-0000Xl-Dx for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:26:20 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:59157 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pq3sB-0000KQ-9L; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:26:19 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0550A3DC5; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:26:23 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=ktCvpZEP3HHveYLT6elmB3hyvpc=; b=vJAJ+Z ExCiicGAdSeHLFUjiv0TFUhj9QnfMiHdrs3KP9keoV5jHfUalk/D5JpnPchCfVsv FRkiGo8w3ukItXt3nlyaBxuesRCJZFctEQ0z5/yqdcQGyRhyPn4T1H7vXzSBq2Lu Oh2Ilk/UlT63YPGSCnlse9fjbT01AbqcDJRfA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=EAjju7Taj0SyiAYEo5ZkyylglGo5BCyx UW+Vh2aWh47WuqpEyXU5jLLZYxBVFBVn0n9Df+j/SDx66c0qUM28ZliQrPBksJiA 9IgqovFQPNYuFzO39jLk+1h3I7Lhig7vZLU10ZqphbvlvuXz6VB1GRMQEEAtqWak v5vdcSKtOg0= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5CC83DC1; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:26:20 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DAF983DB2; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:26:17 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <4D5CED2D.6090600@gnu.org> (Luca Saiu's message of "Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:41:01 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 821BB2EA-3A99-11E0-93B1-AF401E47CF6F-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:5170 Archived-At: On Thu 17 Feb 2011 10:41, Luca Saiu writes: > I've tried with the latest 7.2 tarball I've found at > http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Hans_Boehm/gc/gc_source/ , i.e. the > alpha5 of 2011-02-01; to make it quick yes, the thing worked, so the > problem probably depended on libgc. Sorry for the noise. NP. Did you also enable parallel collection on that build? > [luca@optimum ~/projects-by-others/guile-2.0.0/doc/example-smob]$ > pkg-config guile-2.0 --cflags > Package guile-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path. > Perhaps you should add the directory containing `guile-2.0.pc' > to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable > No package 'guile-2.0' found Indeed, just as you add paths to the other env vars, you need to do so for pkg-config. See "Environment Variables" in the pkg-config(1) man page. > [luca@optimum ~/projects-by-others/guile-2.0.0/doc/example-smob]$ gcc -c > `guile-config compile` myguile.c This is really strange, for me, because I think the current guile-config just shells out to pkg-config. Is it possible you modified the environment in the meantime? > Thanks for 2.0 :-) Thanks for the bug reports :) Have fun with Guile, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/