From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: [patches] three patches for configure.ac (and not only) Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 15:55:35 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301752539 18954 80.91.229.12 (2 Apr 2011 13:55:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 13:55:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org To: Douglas Mencken Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 02 15:55:35 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q61Ic-0004Qr-Ax for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 15:55:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48003 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q61Ib-00062r-Rs for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 09:55:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40762 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q61IS-00061r-Ra for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 09:55:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q61IQ-0002aT-QO for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 09:55:24 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:40142 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q61IQ-0002aE-O5 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 09:55:22 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A59D333CB; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 09:57:10 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=/kiy8GKBMsI9rVuoghIciaYm5iQ=; b=U4wfXt EzjfMcafR0ZVVicx3AYk1rEVA7YUc6G36aYRXO+wZD+Hxv5PRNbotLU7xkrv70wn TOFqhRUkJC3JcVl/FeSHgKkR2j8OcPayUAT04WjPtS0lXP+oPgqPGsA4uNKmsRLx fdg/0oMuV076JPh1n4hbY/mEsUZZll22CXNaM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=uO9fjnnGm4mQg4lZl51tgn72LG52E2Bi 6ggw5vrKMXQXDLKVmJG0M0VrPBCVLmER55Qr5ZpM+LlkNYJCjMJZnBkaKe70C62V i/p4wbAOy5h/dCfElw92xHDTmHuXTl8Uy6ZjJ62cy2qcOHAa0r/XfTyXltLYdg9e trRPXonJlos= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9395C33AE; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 09:57:08 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EC0CA33AC; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 09:57:06 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Douglas Mencken's message of "Sat, 2 Apr 2011 15:40:15 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 1997A318-5D31-11E0-80EF-E8AB60295C12-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:5412 Archived-At: Hi Douglas, I had said: >> Can you re-post these patches as patches, please, using `diff -u', or >> git-format-patch. Please include log messages as well. You replied: On Sat 02 Apr 2011 15:40, Douglas Mencken writes: > Build log if those patches are not applied is attached. Do you really > prefer diff rather than sed? Okay. I can apply and diff then, if you > do like diff so much and don't have `sed' on your side. I prefer git-format-patch output :) By "log messages", I meant commit log messages, not build logs. Thanks, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/