From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix bug: Init auto var to unrandomize `stack_depth' rv. Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:35:08 +0100 Message-ID: References: <877hrroaux.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <87skadrh67.fsf@ambire.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1263326049 29436 80.91.229.12 (12 Jan 2010 19:54:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:54:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org To: Thien-Thi Nguyen Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 12 20:54:01 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NUmoQ-0000By-7M for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:53:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36894 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NUmoQ-0007fo-Rs for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:53:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NUmhN-0002Y7-9i for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:46:41 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NUmhI-0002Uq-Mk for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:46:40 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51490 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NUmhI-0002Ui-AR for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:46:36 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:54678 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NUmhI-00078D-07 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:46:36 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1107903B0; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:46:35 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=j0cISepcRkyrW1e89rnMEDMRft0=; b=xtFvLu SgnTSHKvBYXc0rTgzd3VrT+Kuo5hoqmMq9IIL35cKoLbWQv09GOECol6cSFpEJjS ryIZzTPz9EYkJVKkNERZlSUpb8wy6QOeWRgkxaHuZL/h+jopD5WdiFIYDVB7apCo aoV1RSbFphC20iOV0lYBPIWZjbQuR/oGpUYrk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=wprhmWdd3VB2vaqW5I7MR99/mjoC3VPK UJrM6+KEncJTveKPdhv0Vw6um1KqpqNs98R0QbbN1k+ocQI3TUaIAEIp0g0EYWPS 1hZ9U4WNMlEFlW7HG5/FBz7EEhAIj8cd3V8rzjzjjE2YUV+UopTFX3jyHLKat0JQ ewySfa+E2J4= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB7B903AF; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:46:34 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from unquote (unknown [81.38.180.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E34B9903AC; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:46:32 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87skadrh67.fsf@ambire.localdomain> (Thien-Thi Nguyen's message of "Sun, 10 Jan 2010 18:41:36 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 308FD540-FFB3-11DE-BB94-9D59EE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:4457 Archived-At: On Sun 10 Jan 2010 18:41, Thien-Thi Nguyen writes: > () Andy Wingo > () Sat, 09 Jan 2010 23:29:34 +0100 > > Applied, along with some other patches. > > Cool, thanks. > > If you're going to send patches like this, I'm very happy to > apply them; but it would be easier for me if you just sent the > messages produced by git-format-patch, so I could just pipe > your whole message through git-am. > > As it is I have to edit the commit logs to cut until the > git-format-patch body. > > Often i include some kind of commentary describing the patch or > the motivation of the patch, etc. Where should i include that > info? Maybe "git-format-patch --attach"? For me, if I would be interested in knowing it in a couple years, it should go in the commit log. Otherwise I guess it is nice, and I should finally learn how to use GNUS properly at some point... Andy -- http://wingolog.org/