From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: GC bug in guile 2.0.1 (hashtab implementation) Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 11:36:20 +0200 Message-ID: References: <48057312-D657-4AFF-9199-C2ECEF18CF57@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1306748201 22280 80.91.229.12 (30 May 2011 09:36:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 09:36:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org To: michaelawells Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 30 11:36:37 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QQyto-00023I-CE for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 11:36:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36092 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QQytn-0001uh-Gb for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 05:36:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35728) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QQyth-0001uP-Ng for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 05:36:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QQyte-0005ie-3H for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 05:36:29 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:40932 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QQytd-0005iZ-W8 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 05:36:26 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E81925DD; Mon, 30 May 2011 05:38:33 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=xwCTPoQyvUpmd+Z5XpsXznFIQ/o=; b=l8cMAs vkJOgBYQlh4TIJMXzNeMAkdQj6weAvX4/KwEwQ1XnHAM8solIelLbKKH35mmtDqJ ADkeVQbfG+WS7xGQtJVv9PRYnXAhzZktOstlTZoJE0nKpUxsb7eTW8iP4uGEvxfw qF9nHjPTIWdLF6IVXLs1Qkdgh2GZSKhMluiUU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=SG/GQAt3ed9VaiaNo6mAppYDTQmfkTmo S3G5r9ofK84DJGvwjQrfYu5sO0hV09DoWDkEo63EJ/FvbkemvOqbIm3b3+eW9MXP A4BJF3zMjPe5egIsT7hN8qMCxCmPFR6fA/b8l+wsgBkKn0caV/K+rvfl2QW5bhJw Hz+Gs+6u7XY= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C64725DC; Mon, 30 May 2011 05:38:32 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [91.117.99.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B406925DB; Mon, 30 May 2011 05:38:30 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <48057312-D657-4AFF-9199-C2ECEF18CF57@gmail.com> (michaelawells@gmail.com's message of "Tue, 24 May 2011 16:25:15 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 953593A8-8AA0-11E0-A837-D6B6226F3D4C-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:5627 Archived-At: On Tue 24 May 2011 23:25, michaelawells writes: > I've isolated a bug in the implementation of "scm_internal_hash_fold" in > Guile 2.0.1, which causes an assertion failure in > "vacuum_weak_hash_table". Thanks very much for this detailed report. I have now pushed a fix, along the lines that you suggested. Cheers! Andy -- http://wingolog.org/