From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: Segmentation Fault in guile-1.8.7 on recent Macbook Pro Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:10:23 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20101023114021.GA18953@eris.fms-edv.de> <87ocaboacn.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290093333 23047 80.91.229.12 (18 Nov 2010 15:15:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 15:15:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org, Fabian Schuetz To: Neil Jerram Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 18 16:15:27 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PJ6Cp-0005Ql-1D for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:15:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55082 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PJ67y-0003oM-S8 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:10:22 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40763 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PJ64K-0002jY-Ga for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:06:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PJ64F-0006lh-5P for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:06:32 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:50466 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PJ64F-0006lY-1h for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:06:31 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48C612617; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:06:41 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=iILlf9C+SCIge/2EMKDqrL7smUM=; b=bdOWel pRIB0UBig9oXHX5Z3naVQRhW3aV4MtWJ8Sq+ir5pfb6d+/0JmpNGaFwQ4OEJEnXP 4HoIYvr/vTCaxj1e4bBERFgMCh6nrgfnRK1QR9hnlN0YrZSL4t9QgPfYClaxouAx kj7E+Hk2ZzdaS8prEcQ40X6GXIJEAZAOG9NCk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=iy5IlnBbSc/Plya30LUj+ZnQHIjUnbfc CvbZllh/i0uZ2d0Qrw3x8dz3Vhxaqq6qkPgLKRvHLZ8y8noUdhlkCcFXHO/fzuxv DiIPickC8DY8HKEzJ8Uu+P2e9exdfwg8YjV5kfkQBCLenWqXjqCTbtBHuN7xbFVS mAvA+dOulWc= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294172616; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:06:39 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [88.0.167.185]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 12E8B2615; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:06:35 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87ocaboacn.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Sat, 30 Oct 2010 16:58:45 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 71B2E844-F325-11DF-B01A-B53272ABC92C-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:4865 Archived-At: On Sat 30 Oct 2010 17:58, Neil Jerram writes: > Fabian Schuetz writes: > >> (undefine list) > > Unless there's a compelling need, I'm afraid it's unlikely anyone will > work on this, because most developer focus is now on 1.9/2.0. Indeed, `undefine' doesn't exist in 1.9/2.0. If you still have questions, Fabian, let us know how we can help you do what you need to do without using undefine. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/